BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24692457)

  • 1. Waste management in the Irkutsk Region, Siberia, Russia: environmental assessment of current practice focusing on landfilling.
    Starostina V; Damgaard A; Rechberger H; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 May; 32(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24692457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waste management in the Irkutsk region, Siberia, Russia: An environmental assessment of alternative development scenarios.
    Starostina V; Damgaard A; Eriksen MK; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Apr; 36(4):373-385. PubMed ID: 29475411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling.
    Manfredi S; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 18445517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental assessment of low-organic waste landfill scenarios by means of life-cycle assessment modelling (EASEWASTE).
    Manfredi S; Christensen TH; Scharff H; Jacobs J
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 19710111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling of environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling within the life-cycle analysis program EASEWASTE.
    Kirkeby JT; Birgisdottir H; Bhander GS; Hauschild M; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(7):961-70. PubMed ID: 17382531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of individual waste fractions to the environmental impacts from landfilling of municipal solid waste.
    Manfredi S; Tonini D; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 19854039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LCA and economic evaluation of landfill leachate and gas technologies.
    Damgaard A; Manfredi S; Merrild H; Stensøe S; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1532-41. PubMed ID: 21435856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China.
    Dong J; Chi Y; Zou D; Fu C; Huang Q; Ni M
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24163375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stable isotope signatures for characterising the biological stability of landfilled municipal solid waste.
    Wimmer B; Hrad M; Huber-Humer M; Watzinger A; Wyhlidal S; Reichenauer TG
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2083-90. PubMed ID: 23540355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.
    Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying capital goods for waste landfilling.
    Brogaard LK; Stentsøe S; Willumsen HC; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Jun; 31(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 23535149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between lab- and full-scale applications of in situ aeration of an old landfill and assessment of long-term emission development after completion.
    Hrad M; Gamperling O; Huber-Humer M
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2061-73. PubMed ID: 23428564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental impact assessment of leachate recirculation in landfill of municipal solid waste by comparing with evaporation and discharge (EASEWASTE).
    Xing W; Lu W; Zhao Y; Zhang X; Deng W; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):382-9. PubMed ID: 23177016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.
    Manfredi S; Tonini D; Christensen TH; Scharff H
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Nov; 27(8):825-36. PubMed ID: 19808732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion.
    Assamoi B; Lawryshyn Y
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 22099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of municipal solid waste treatment methods on greenhouse gas emissions in Lahore, Pakistan.
    Batool SA; Chuadhry MN
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 18387288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental assessment of waste management in Greenland: current practice and potential future developments.
    Eisted R; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 23539347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of microbial methane generation and oxidation rates in the municipal solid waste landfill of Kaluga city, Russia.
    Zyakun AM; Muravyev AI; Baskunov BP; Laurinavichius KS; Zakharchenko VN; Peshenko VP; Lykov IN; Shestakova GA
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2010 Mar; 46(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 20229386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.