These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 246925)

  • 1. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. I. Potential impact of changes in raw material availability and performance criteria.
    Keim FM
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 246925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. III. Impact on the end user.
    Grimes TL
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 246927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. II. Changes in accelerators.
    Greene GE
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 246926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommended testing methodology for rubber closures.
    Hilty WW
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1968; 22(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 5649569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraction rates of marker compounds from rubber closures for parenteral use. II. mechanism of extraction and evaluation of select extraction parameters.
    Boyett JB; Avis KE
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1976; 30(4):169-79. PubMed ID: 953369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of elastomeric closures for parenteral use: an overview.
    Wood RT
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1980; 34(4):286-94. PubMed ID: 6902776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rubber stopper and component identification using syringeless gas chromatography.
    Mattson LN; Gaebler RN; Giebe KE; Peppers RE
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1980; 34(6):436-46. PubMed ID: 6906366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of container/closure integrity: viscoelastic measurements of elastomeric closures.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1988; 42(4):127-41. PubMed ID: 3183867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European test methods for rubber closures.
    Brinkhoff O
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1969; 23(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 5807464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for the extraction of soluble aluminum from chlorobutyl rubber closures.
    Mondimore D; Moore C
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1983; 37(3):79-81. PubMed ID: 6875744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glass and rubber closure effects on the pH of water I. A preliminary investigation.
    Preston WA; Anderson NR
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1984; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6707830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lyophilization closures for protein based drugs.
    DeGrazio F; Flynn K
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1992; 46(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 1588459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural identification of extractables from rubber closures used for pre-filled semisolid drug applicator by chromatography, mass spectrometry, and organic synthesis.
    Zhang F; Chang A; Karaisz K; Feng R; Cai J
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2004 Mar; 34(5):841-9. PubMed ID: 15019018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a disposable rubber closure or bulk irrigating solutions.
    Newton DW; Rogers AG; Croswell RW; Hendrix L
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1972 Aug; 29(8):678-83. PubMed ID: 5052414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of primary packaging on the quality of parenteral products.
    Solomun L; Ibric S; Boltic Z; Djuric Z; Stupar B
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Nov; 48(3):744-8. PubMed ID: 18786797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests for measuring consistent closure quality.
    Hopkins GH
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1969; 23(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 5807463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual seal force measurement of parenteral vials. II. Elastomer evaluation.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1988; 42(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3385543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of the resistance of packaging materials to the action of anesthetics].
    Sominskii AA; Shenfil' LZ; Tumanova NV; Spiridonova SI; Shneps-Shneppe NA
    Med Tekh; 1972; 5():20-3. PubMed ID: 4663454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative chemical testing of plugs used for sealing infusion bottles.
    Varga J; Molnár I
    Ann Immunol Hung; 1973; 17():273-9. PubMed ID: 4805813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General guidelines for the selection and processing of rubber closures for parenteral products.
    Anschel J
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1977; 31(6):302-8. PubMed ID: 597651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.