These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24693227)

  • 21. Investigation of construction wastes generated in the Malaysian residential sector.
    Umar UA; Shafiq N; Isa MH
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 30114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety cost management in construction companies: A proposal classification.
    López-Alonso M; Ibarrondo-Dávila MP; Rubio MC
    Work; 2016 Jun; 54(3):617-30. PubMed ID: 27315408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bridging the gap between health and safety performance and owner's satisfaction in construction projects adopting pro-environmental construction practices: role of economic performance.
    Onubi HO; Carpio M; Azian FUM; Binwai P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(21):59844-59860. PubMed ID: 37016254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management--a perspective of Malaysian contractors.
    Begum RA; Siwar C; Pereira JJ; Jaafar AH
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(12):1902-9. PubMed ID: 17110094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeling the effects of production pressure on safety performance in construction projects using system dynamics.
    Mohammadi A; Tavakolan M
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():273-284. PubMed ID: 31862039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety management implementation drivers for construction projects: a structural equation modelling approach.
    Abu Aisheh YI; Alaloul WS; Alhammadi SA; Tayeh BA
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Dec; 29(4):1358-1367. PubMed ID: 36177998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A New Model for Solving Time-Cost-Quality Trade-Off Problems in Construction.
    Fu F; Zhang T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167142. PubMed ID: 27911939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia.
    Balasbaneh AT; Ramli MZ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):43186-43201. PubMed ID: 32734541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Construction and demolition waste indicators.
    Mália M; de Brito J; Pinheiro MD; Bravo M
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):241-55. PubMed ID: 23315370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incentive Mechanism and Subsidy Design for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling under Information Asymmetry with Reciprocal Behaviors.
    Su P; Peng Y; Hu Q; Tan R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32560518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analyzing the mediating effect of economic performance on the relationship between green construction practices and health and safety performance in Nigeria.
    Onubi HO; Yusof N; Hassan AS; Bahdad AAS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(27):36598-36610. PubMed ID: 33709310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors affecting prefabricated construction promotion in China: A structural equation modeling approach.
    Jiang W; Huang Z; Peng Y; Fang Y; Cao Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227787. PubMed ID: 31986175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of critical factors in construction and demolition waste recycling by the grey-DEMATEL approach: a Chinese perspective.
    Liu H; Long H; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):8507-8525. PubMed ID: 31907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distribution of materials in construction and demolition waste in Portugal.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Aug; 29(8):843-53. PubMed ID: 20498131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation Method for Quality Risks of Safety in Prefabricated Building Construction Using SEM-SDM Approach.
    Li X; Wang C; Kassem MA; Alhajlah HH; Bimenyimana S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis on the hidden cost of prefabricated buildings based on FISM-BN.
    Peng J; Zhou J; Meng F; Yu Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252138. PubMed ID: 34081711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using Interpretative Structural Modeling to Identify Critical Success Factors for Safety Management in Subway Construction: A China Study.
    Liu P; Li Q; Bian J; Song L; Xiahou X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29958438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety incentive and penalty provisions in Indian construction projects and their impact on safety performance.
    Hasan A; Jha KN
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2013; 20(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 22248124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring the Application of BIM Technology in the Whole Process of Construction Cost Management with Computational Intelligence.
    Tang D; Liu K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4080879. PubMed ID: 36120697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of factors influencing safety management for metro construction in China.
    Yu QZ; Ding LY; Zhou C; Luo HB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jul; 68():131-8. PubMed ID: 23932091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.