240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24694304)
1. Gender differences in the importance of participation associated with injured workers/persons perceived barriers to returning to work in the context of vocational rehabilitation.
Kvam L; Eide AH
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 24694304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding experiences of participation among men and women with chronic musculoskeletal pain in vocational rehabilitation.
Kvam L; Eide AH; Vik K
Work; 2013; 45(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 23241707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Beemster TT; van Velzen JM; van Bennekom CA; Frings-Dresen MH; Reneman MF
Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():317. PubMed ID: 26215748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of participation in major life areas matters for return to work.
Kvam L; Vik K; Eide AH
J Occup Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 25(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 25319539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Returning to work - a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation.
Hellman T; Jensen I; Bergström G; Busch H
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24893975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Associations between socio-demographic factors, encounters with healthcare professionals and perceived ability to return to work in people sick-listed due to heart failure in Sweden: a cross-sectional study.
Nordgren L; Söderlund A
Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 25835330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Workers who stay at work despite chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: do they differ from workers with sick leave?
de Vries HJ; Reneman MF; Groothoff JW; Geertzen JH; Brouwer S
J Occup Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 22(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 22454300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequence analysis to assess labour market participation following vocational rehabilitation: an observational study among patients sick-listed with low back pain from a randomised clinical trial in Denmark.
Lindholdt L; Labriola M; Nielsen CV; Horsbøl TA; Lund T
BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e015661. PubMed ID: 28729315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting non-return to work in patients attending cardiac rehabilitation.
Samkange-Zeeb F; Altenhöner T; Berg G; Schott T
Int J Rehabil Res; 2006 Mar; 29(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16432389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study of the association between the readiness for return to work scale and future work participation in Norway.
Braathen TN; Brage S; Tellnes G; Irene O; Chris J; Eftedal M
J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 24(4):650-7. PubMed ID: 24395042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Vocational integration after a two-year retraining measure in vocational retraining centres--a prognostic model].
Köster T; Fehr M; Slesina W
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Oct; 46(5):258-65. PubMed ID: 17955393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disembodied abilities: sick role and participation in 'activating' return-to-work practices.
van Hal L; Meershoek A; Nijhuis F; Horstman K
Soc Sci Med; 2013 Nov; 96():9-16. PubMed ID: 24034946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the implementation of the protocol of an early vocational rehabilitation intervention for people with acquired brain injury.
van Velzen JM; van Bennekom CA; van Dormolen M; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 25738905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Return to Work in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Multidisciplinary Intervention Versus Brief Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Brendbekken R; Eriksen HR; Grasdal A; Harris A; Hagen EM; Tangen T
J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 27(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 26910406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals.
de Geus CJC; Huysmans MA; van Rijssen HJ; Anema JR
BMC Public Health; 2022 May; 22(1):875. PubMed ID: 35501737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors for return to work in patients with sciatica.
Grøvle L; Haugen AJ; Keller A; Ntvig B; Brox JI; Grotle M
Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1849-57. PubMed ID: 24060231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heart failure clients' encounters with professionals and self-rated ability to return to work.
Nordgren L; Söderlund A
Scand J Occup Ther; 2016; 23(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 26337863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Entry into vocational rehabilitation program following work-related hand injury: Potential candidates.
Chen YH; Hsu CY; Lien SH; Yu SJ; Chang JM; Su SW; Chao YH
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2016; 29(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 26489947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of a rehabilitation model for employees on long-term sick leave in the public sector: difficulties, counter-measures, and outcomes.
Heijbel B; Josephson M; Vingård E
Work; 2013; 45(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 22976164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave.
Braathen TN; Veiersted KB; Heggenes J
J Rehabil Med; 2007 Jul; 39(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 17624485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]