380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24694786)
1. A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography.
Bourque AE; Carrier JF; Bouchard H
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 59(8):2059-88. PubMed ID: 24694786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A theoretical comparison of tissue parameter extraction methods for dual energy computed tomography.
Tremblay JÉ; Bedwani S; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081905. PubMed ID: 25086536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single- and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications.
Landry G; Parodi K; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5029-48. PubMed ID: 23831541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography.
Hünemohr N; Krauss B; Dinkel J; Gillmann C; Ackermann B; Jäkel O; Greilich S
Z Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 23(4):300-13. PubMed ID: 23597413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues.
Yang M; Virshup G; Clayton J; Zhu XR; Mohan R; Dong L
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1343-62. PubMed ID: 20145291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients.
Landry G; Seco J; Gaudreault M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6851-66. PubMed ID: 24025623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electron density and effective atomic number estimation in a maximum a posteriori framework for dual-energy computed tomography.
Simard M; Bär E; Blais D; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4137-4149. PubMed ID: 32491193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation.
Han D; Siebers JV; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):600. PubMed ID: 26745952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Royle G; Lu HM; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2332-2344. PubMed ID: 28295434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
