BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24695406)

  • 1. Deconvolving tumor purity and ploidy by integrating copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity.
    Li Y; Xie X
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 30(15):2121-9. PubMed ID: 24695406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MixClone: a mixture model for inferring tumor subclonal populations.
    Li Y; Xie X
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. PubMed ID: 25707430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AbsCN-seq: a statistical method to estimate tumor purity, ploidy and absolute copy numbers from next-generation sequencing data.
    Bao L; Pu M; Messer K
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 30(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 24389661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurity: accurate tumor purity and ploidy inference from tumor-normal WGS data by jointly modelling somatic copy number alterations and heterozygous germline single-nucleotide-variants.
    Luo Z; Fan X; Su Y; Huang YS
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(12):2004-2011. PubMed ID: 29385401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CLImAT-HET: detecting subclonal copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-genome sequencing data.
    Yu Z; Li A; Wang M
    BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Mar; 10(1):15. PubMed ID: 28298214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OncoSNP-SEQ: a statistical approach for the identification of somatic copy number alterations from next-generation sequencing of cancer genomes.
    Yau C
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(19):2482-4. PubMed ID: 23926227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of somatic copy number variation detection by NGS technologies and bioinformatics tools on a hyper-diploid cancer genome.
    Masood D; Ren L; Nguyen C; Brundu FG; Zheng L; Zhao Y; Jaeger E; Li Y; Cha SW; Halpern A; Truong S; Virata M; Yan C; Chen Q; Pang A; Alberto R; Xiao C; Yang Z; Chen W; Wang C; Cross F; Catreux S; Shi L; Beaver JA; Xiao W; Meerzaman DM
    Genome Biol; 2024 Jun; 25(1):163. PubMed ID: 38902799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational methods for DNA copy-number analysis of tumors.
    Kendall J; Krasnitz A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1176():243-59. PubMed ID: 25030933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. WaveCNV: allele-specific copy number alterations in primary tumors and xenograft models from next-generation sequencing.
    Holt C; Losic B; Pai D; Zhao Z; Trinh Q; Syam S; Arshadi N; Jang GH; Ali J; Beck T; McPherson J; Muthuswamy LB
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 24192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. tHapMix: simulating tumour samples through haplotype mixtures.
    Ivakhno S; Colombo C; Tanner S; Tedder P; Berri S; Cox AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):280-282. PubMed ID: 27605106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrative pipeline for profiling DNA copy number and inferring tumor phylogeny.
    Urrutia E; Chen H; Zhou Z; Zhang NR; Jiang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(12):2126-2128. PubMed ID: 29415173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SCNVSim: somatic copy number variation and structure variation simulator.
    Qin M; Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Hu Q; Cheng Y; Murakami M; Odunsi AO; Johnson CS; Wei L; Liu S; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 25886838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
    Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing.
    Shen R; Seshan VE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Sep; 44(16):e131. PubMed ID: 27270079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence data.
    Gusnanto A; Wood HM; Pawitan Y; Rabbitts P; Berri S
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22039209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Canvas: versatile and scalable detection of copy number variants.
    Roller E; Ivakhno S; Lee S; Royce T; Tanner S
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(15):2375-7. PubMed ID: 27153601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ploidy- and Purity-Adjusted Allele-Specific DNA Analysis Using CLONETv2.
    Prandi D; Demichelis F
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 67(1):e81. PubMed ID: 31524989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TargetClone: A multi-sample approach for reconstructing subclonal evolution of tumors.
    Nieboer MM; Dorssers LCJ; Straver R; Looijenga LHJ; de Ridder J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208002. PubMed ID: 30496231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CNValidator: validating somatic copy-number inference.
    Smith LP; Yamato JA; Kuhner MK
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 35(15):2660-2662. PubMed ID: 30541069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DEFOR: depth- and frequency-based somatic copy number alteration detector.
    Zhang H; Zhan X; Brugarolas J; Xie Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3824-3825. PubMed ID: 30860569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.