These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24695543)

  • 1. Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms.
    Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93892. PubMed ID: 24695543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme.
    Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    Neuroscience; 2014 Oct; 278():385-96. PubMed ID: 25173152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interlimb differences in coordination of unsupported reaching movements.
    Schaffer JE; Sainburg RL
    Neuroscience; 2017 May; 350():54-64. PubMed ID: 28344068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.
    Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 11807578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position.
    Duff SV; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 17171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers.
    Przybyla A; Good DC; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 22113487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme.
    Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():153-67. PubMed ID: 21889579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.
    Reuter EM; Cunnington R; Mattingley JB; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2260-2271. PubMed ID: 27582293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Handedness results from complementary hemispheric dominance, not global hemispheric dominance: evidence from mechanically coupled bilateral movements.
    Woytowicz EJ; Westlake KP; Whitall J; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Aug; 120(2):729-740. PubMed ID: 29742023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance.
    Wang J; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 178(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 17380323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of age-related modifications of upper limb motor control strategies in a new dynamic environment.
    Cesqui B; Macrì G; Dario P; Micera S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 5():31. PubMed ID: 19019228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilateral, 3D Arm Movement Kinematics Are Encoded in Ipsilateral Human Cortex.
    Bundy DT; Szrama N; Pahwa M; Leuthardt EC
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(47):10042-10056. PubMed ID: 30301759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similarity in the dynamics of contralateral motor overflow through increasing frequency of movement in a single limb.
    Morrison S; Hong SL; Newell KM
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 213(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 21769546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handedness and Reach-to-Place Kinematics in Adults: Left-Handers Are Not Reversed Right-Handers.
    Nelson EL; Berthier NE; Konidaris GD
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(4):381-391. PubMed ID: 28876178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.
    Srinivasan GA; Embar T; Sainburg R
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):713-725. PubMed ID: 32060564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.
    Goble DJ; Brown SH
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):693-704. PubMed ID: 17297548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization.
    Shabbott BA; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 100(2):565-75. PubMed ID: 18497366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.
    Coelho CJ; Przybyla A; Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb; 109(3):825-38. PubMed ID: 23155169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment.
    Takahashi CD; Scheidt RA; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Aug; 86(2):1047-51. PubMed ID: 11495973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment.
    Schabowsky CN; Hidler JM; Lum PS
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 182(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 17611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.