These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24695589)
41. constNJ: an algorithm to reconstruct sets of phylogenetic trees satisfying pairwise topological constraints. Matsen FA J Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):799-818. PubMed ID: 20500096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ranked Subtree Prune and Regraft. Collienne L; Whidden C; Gavryushkin A Bull Math Biol; 2024 Jan; 86(3):24. PubMed ID: 38294587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparing Phylogenetic Trees by Matching Nodes Using the Transfer Distance Between Partitions. Bogdanowicz D; Giaro K J Comput Biol; 2017 May; 24(5):422-435. PubMed ID: 28177699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Consistency of topological moves based on the balanced minimum evolution principle of phylogenetic inference. Bordewich M; Gascuel O; Huber KT; Moulton V IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 19179704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study. Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A spectrum of verticality across genes. Nagies FSP; Brueckner J; Tria FDK; Martin WF PLoS Genet; 2020 Nov; 16(11):e1009200. PubMed ID: 33137105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Maximum likelihood supertrees. Steel M; Rodrigo A Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Concatenated alignments and the case of the disappearing tree. Thiergart T; Landan G; Martin WF BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 14():266. PubMed ID: 25547755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A new fast method for inferring multiple consensus trees using k-medoids. Tahiri N; Willems M; Makarenkov V BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Apr; 18(1):48. PubMed ID: 29621975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quantifying MCMC exploration of phylogenetic tree space. Whidden C; Matsen FA Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):472-91. PubMed ID: 25631175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. Wolf YI; Rogozin IB; Grishin NV; Tatusov RL; Koonin EV BMC Evol Biol; 2001 Oct; 1():8. PubMed ID: 11734060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. Fitzpatrick DA; Logue ME; Stajich JE; Butler G BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 6():99. PubMed ID: 17121679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Inferring species trees from incongruent multi-copy gene trees using the Robinson-Foulds distance. Chaudhary R; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D Algorithms Mol Biol; 2013 Nov; 8(1):28. PubMed ID: 24180377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Exploring the Tiers of Rooted Phylogenetic Network Space Using Tail Moves. Janssen R; Jones M; Erdős PL; van Iersel L; Scornavacca C Bull Math Biol; 2018 Aug; 80(8):2177-2208. PubMed ID: 29948885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accounting for horizontal gene transfers explains conflicting hypotheses regarding the position of aquificales in the phylogeny of Bacteria. Boussau B; Guéguen L; Gouy M BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Oct; 8():272. PubMed ID: 18834516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improved Practical Algorithms for Rooted Subtree Prune and Regraft (rSPR) Distance and Hybridization Number. Yamada K; Chen ZZ; Wang L J Comput Biol; 2020 Sep; 27(9):1422-1432. PubMed ID: 32048865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Does a tree-like phylogeny only exist at the tips in the prokaryotes? Creevey CJ; Fitzpatrick DA; Philip GK; Kinsella RJ; O'Connell MJ; Pentony MM; Travers SA; Wilkinson M; McInerney JO Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2551-8. PubMed ID: 15615680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]