665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24695919)
1. Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon?
Aggarwal VK; Goyal N; Deirmengian G; Rangavajulla A; Parvizi J; Austin MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 24695919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.
Meehan JP; Danielsen B; Kim SH; Jamali AA; White RH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 24695918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Bini S; Khatod M; Cafri G; Chen Y; Paxton EW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Dec; 95(24):2195-202. PubMed ID: 24352773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.
Abdel MP; Ledford CK; Kobic A; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):647-652. PubMed ID: 28455474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morbid Obesity: Increased Risk of Failure After Aseptic Revision TKA.
Watts CD; Wagner ER; Houdek MT; Lewallen DG; Mabry TM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2621-7. PubMed ID: 25845948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age.
de Steiger RN; Liu YL; Graves SE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Apr; 97(8):635-42. PubMed ID: 25878307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection.
Watts CD; Wagner ER; Houdek MT; Osmon DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Mabry TM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(18):e154. PubMed ID: 25232084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: 1 in 3 Risk of Re-Revision by 10 Years.
Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S266-S270. PubMed ID: 30824295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 19487523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Ake CF; Wang C; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?
Dyrhovden GS; Lygre SHL; Badawy M; Gøthesen Ø; Furnes O
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jul; 475(7):1874-1886. PubMed ID: 28299718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery.
Thiele K; Perka C; Matziolis G; Mayr HO; Sostheim M; Hube R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 May; 97(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 25948517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail?
Suarez J; Griffin W; Springer B; Fehring T; Mason JB; Odum S
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):99-103. PubMed ID: 18538534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Body Mass Index on Reoperation and Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Wagner ER; Kamath AF; Fruth K; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Dec; 98(24):2052-2060. PubMed ID: 28002368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Sheng PY; Konttinen L; Lehto M; Ogino D; Jämsen E; Nevalainen J; Pajamäki J; Halonen P; Konttinen YT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul; 88(7):1425-30. PubMed ID: 16818966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
