These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24696390)

  • 1. The persistence of distraction: a study of attentional biases by fear, faces, and context.
    Parks EL; Kim SY; Hopfinger JB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 24696390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.
    Sato S; Kawahara JI
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 25030814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gamma-band activity reflects attentional guidance by facial expression.
    Müsch K; Siegel M; Engel AK; Schneider TR
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():1142-1148. PubMed ID: 27637862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction biases working memory for faces.
    Mallett R; Mummaneni A; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 31907852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinded by fear? Prior exposure to fearful faces enhances attentional processing of task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Berggren N; Derakshan N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2204-18. PubMed ID: 23510073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M; Muramatsu Y; Mizuno S; Kurahashi N; Kurahashi H; Nakamura M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
    Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
    Silvert L; Funes MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():124-34. PubMed ID: 26642227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional capture by task-irrelevant fearful faces is revealed by the N2pc component.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Jan; 74(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 16899334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target and distractor processing and the influence of load on the allocation of attention to task-irrelevant threat.
    Bretherton PM; Eysenck MW; Richards A; Holmes A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Aug; 145():106491. PubMed ID: 28899636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional allocation to task-irrelevant fearful faces is not automatic: experimental evidence for the conditional hypothesis of emotional selection.
    Victeur Q; Huguet P; Silvert L
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Mar; 34(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 31130091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.
    Vermeulen N; Godefroid J; Mermillod M
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7924. PubMed ID: 19936235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jun; 31(7):3323-3337. PubMed ID: 33675357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methylphenidate alters selective attention by amplifying salience.
    ter Huurne N; Fallon SJ; van Schouwenburg M; van der Schaaf M; Buitelaar J; Jensen O; Cools R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Dec; 232(23):4317-23. PubMed ID: 26349753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.