393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697590)
1. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a Canal with a Double Curvature.
Topçuoğlu HS; Topçuoğlu G; Akti A; Düzgün S
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):969-71. PubMed ID: 27091353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of apical transportation and centring ability of five thermally treated NiTi rotary systems.
Pinheiro SR; Alcalde MP; Vivacqua-Gomes N; Bramante CM; Vivan RR; Duarte MAH; Vasconcelos BC
Int Endod J; 2018 Jun; 51(6):705-713. PubMed ID: 29178173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
