These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697590)

  • 21. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A comparative study of three different rotary nickel titanium systems in the preparation of curved molar canals].
    Gu YX; Zhu YQ; DU R
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 18(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19417989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
    Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.
    Çelik G; Özdemir Kısacık F; Yılmaz EF; Mersinlioğlu A; Ertuğrul İF; Orhan H
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7419. PubMed ID: 31489262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Arslan H
    Aust Endod J; 2015 Apr; 41(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 24697976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
    Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
    Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zheng YL; Zhang H; Shu Y; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2007 Sep; 40(9):707-14. PubMed ID: 17645514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
    Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical evaluation of two types of NiTi rotary instruments in preparation of root canals].
    Hu XL; Ling JQ; Chen H; Gu HJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 40(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 15774145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length.
    Vahid A; Roohi N; Zayeri F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 19703083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 Mar; 39(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 23402512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study.
    Rödig T; Hausdörfer T; Konietschke F; Dullin C; Hahn W; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):580-9. PubMed ID: 22264204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison on the shaping ability of three different instruments in preparing curved molar canals].
    Zhu YQ; Gu YX; Du R
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 23(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 16285543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.