These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697690)

  • 21. Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference: analysis by response modality and evaluation.
    Ikeda Y; Hirata S; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):654-60. PubMed ID: 20499573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using Brain Potentials to Functionally Localise Stroop-Like Effects in Colour and Picture Naming: Perceptual Encoding versus Word Planning.
    Shitova N; Roelofs A; Schriefers H; Bastiaansen M; Schoffelen JM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161052. PubMed ID: 27632171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Color-word interference in relation to comparative compatibility: evidence for two sources of interference].
    Schulz T; Liebing D
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):648-68. PubMed ID: 1785215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automatic perception and synaesthesia: evidence from colour and photism naming in a stroop-negative priming task.
    Lupiáñez J; Callejas A
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16683494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stroop interference associated with efficient reading fluency and prelexical orthographic processing.
    Mano QR; Williamson BJ; Pae HK; Osmon DC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 26653862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis.
    Phaf RH; Kan KJ
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):184-99. PubMed ID: 17112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
    Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task.
    Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.
    Jacoby LL; Lindsay DS; Hessels S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):638-44. PubMed ID: 14620358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increased Stroop interference with better second-language reading skill.
    Braet W; Noppe N; Wagemans J; Op de Beeck H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 20924988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD.
    van Mourik R; Oosterlaan J; Sergeant JA
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 46(2):150-65. PubMed ID: 15679524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.