95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697735)
1. Comparison of several multiple imputation strategies for repeated measures analysis of clinical scales: to truncate or not to?
Lipkovich I; Kadziola Z; Xu L; Sugihara T; Mallinckrodt CH
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):924-43. PubMed ID: 24697735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes.
Wood AM; White IR; Hillsdon M; Carpenter J
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 15333619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A structured framework for assessing sensitivity to missing data assumptions in longitudinal clinical trials.
Mallinckrodt CH; Lin Q; Molenberghs M
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23193075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing missing data assumptions in longitudinal studies: an example using a smoking cessation trial.
Yang X; Shoptaw S
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Mar; 77(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 15734221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.
DeSouza CM; Legedza AT; Sankoh AJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1055-73. PubMed ID: 20183464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
Floden L; Bell ML
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.
Shrive FM; Stuart H; Quan H; Ghali WA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17166270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rounding strategies for multiply imputed binary data.
Demirtas H
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):677-88. PubMed ID: 19650057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Doubly robust generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data.
Seaman S; Copas A
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(6):937-55. PubMed ID: 19153970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred.
Moons KG; Donders RA; Stijnen T; Harrell FE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1092-101. PubMed ID: 16980150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments.
Hamilton BH; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Feb; 210(2):125-139.e2. PubMed ID: 20113932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple imputation of missing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Schenker N; Borrud LG; Burt VL; Curtin LR; Flegal KM; Hughes J; Johnson CL; Looker AC; Mirel L
Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 21213343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of imputation methods in ovarian tumor diagnostic models using generalized linear models and support vector machines.
Dimou I; Van Calster B; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D; Zervakis M
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 19605886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.
Rodwell L; Lee KJ; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 24766825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
