These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697774)

  • 1. Identification and effects of common errors and artifacts on the perceived quality of radiographs.
    Nuth EK; Armbrust LJ; Roush JK; Biller DS
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2014 Apr; 244(8):961-7. PubMed ID: 24697774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification and prevalence of errors affecting the quality of radiographs submitted to Australian thoroughbred yearling sale repositories.
    Jackson MA; Vizard AL; Anderson GA; Mattoon JS; Lavelle RB; Smithenson BT; Lester NV; Clarke AF; Whitton RC
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 21342306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study for determination of various positioning errors in digital panoramic radiography for evaluation of diagnostic image quality.
    Khator AM; Motwani MB; Choudhary AB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):666-670. PubMed ID: 29256467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical innovation changes standard radiographic protocols in veterinary medicine: is it necessary to obtain two dorsoproximal-palmarodistal oblique views of the equine foot when using computerised radiography systems?
    Whitlock J; Dixon J; Sherlock C; Tucker R; Bolt DM; Weller R
    Vet Rec; 2016 May; 178(21):531. PubMed ID: 27114406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of common errors and subjective quality of digital panoramic radiographs in dental institution, Riyadh.
    Lingam AS; Koppolu P; Abdulsalam R; Reddy RL; Anwarullah A; Koppolu D
    Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 36695222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic artifacts.
    Kirberger RM; Roos CJ
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1995 Jun; 66(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 8544168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positioning errors in panoramic images in general dentistry in Sörmland County, Sweden.
    Ekströmer K; Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 26995809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiograph quality evaluation for exposure variables--a review.
    Kirberger RM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10519298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL; McMinn WE; Benavides E
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating cone cut in rectangular collimation in intraoral radiography: application of ALADA and radiation stewardship.
    Clark-Perry D; Berkhout WER; Sanderink GC; Slot DE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5391-5402. PubMed ID: 37537518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
    Winstanley TD
    Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance of paediatric lateral chest radiographs.
    Tsitsiou Y; Rajkumar L; Hlabangana LT; Naidoo J; Clark LM; Zar HJ; Andronikou S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Dec; 53(4):623-632. PubMed ID: 36070968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
    Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.