404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697881)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact on perceived root resorption based on the amount of incisal inclination as determined from conventional panoramic radiography.
Tieu LD; Normando D; Toogood R; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 26432324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Alqareer A; Nada R; Ghayyath A; Baghdady M; Allareddy V
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 34030659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of C-shaped canals by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: root-type specificity by longitudinal distribution.
Sinanoglu A; Helvacioglu-Yigit D
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):917-21. PubMed ID: 24935535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 25726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs.
Garcia-Figueroa MA; Raboud DW; Lam EW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18617108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of the root apex position of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic films.
Kim SH; Son WS; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28962733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Lateral Tooth Volume and Morphology Between Buccally and Palatally Localised Unilateral Impacted Maxillary Canine Cases on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Karacin G; Şenişik NE; Yildirim D
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Mar-Apr 01; 32(2):752-756. PubMed ID: 33705027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy and reliability of the expected root position setup methodology to evaluate root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Pi S; Park J; Devgon D; Nelson G; Hatcher D; Oberoi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):583-595. PubMed ID: 30268268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations.
Mckee IW; Williamson PC; Lam EW; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):166-75; quiz 192. PubMed ID: 11840131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Proximity of mandibular third molar root(s) to surrounding cortical bone: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic findings.
Wihokrut S; Vorakulpipat C; Manosuthi P; Waikakul A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 34374876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Semi-automatic and robust determination of dental arch form in dental cone-beam CT with B-spline approximation.
Bae M; Park JW; Kim N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Apr; 172():95-101. PubMed ID: 30902131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance.
Funakoshi T; Shibata T; Inamoto K; Shibata N; Ariji Y; Fukuda M; Nakata K; Ariji E
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 33048311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimizing donor tooth selection for autotransplantation in the anterior maxilla via CBCT-based root width and crown-root angle measurements.
Companioni S; Nguyen T; Divaris K; Christensen J
Dent Traumatol; 2023 Jul; 39 Suppl 1():63-69. PubMed ID: 37060204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
