These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697881)
61. Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus. Lopes LJ; Gamba TO; Bertinato JV; Freitas DQ Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160043. PubMed ID: 27268417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Shahbazian M; Vandewoude C; Wyatt J; Jacobs R Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 23525890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Can we estimate root axis using a 3-dimensional tooth model via lingual-surface intraoral scanning? Lim SW; Park H; Lim SY; Choo HH; Baek SH; Hwang HS; Cho JH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):e99-e109. PubMed ID: 33131571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A five-year follow-up of a root fracture in a ten-year-old boy. Wagner D; Offner D; Musset AM Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):728-739. PubMed ID: 29111127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal. Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Assessment of the reliability of root angulations on panoramic radiographs. Dholakia KD; Bhat SR Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 21935503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on cephalometric diagnosis. Paula LK; Solon-de-Mello Pde A; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 25992984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Prevalence of Second Mesiobuccal Canals in Maxillary First Molars Detected Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography, Direct Occlusal Access, and Coronal Plane Grinding. Hiebert BM; Abramovitch K; Rice D; Torabinejad M J Endod; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1711-1715. PubMed ID: 28735796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone. Çiftçi ME; Aktan AM; İşman Ö; Yıldırım E Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison of the effect of using panoramic and cone-beam computed tomography on the accuracy of root position in indirect digital bracket placement: A retrospective study. Yilmaz H; Eglenen MN Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Aug; 25(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 34837461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Radiographic localization of unerupted maxillary anterior teeth using the vertical tube shift technique: the history and application of the method with some case reports. Jacobs SG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 10511669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study of buccal plate thickness of the maxillary and mandibular posterior dentition. Temple KE; Schoolfield J; Noujeim ME; Huynh-Ba G; Lasho DJ; Mealey BL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1072-8. PubMed ID: 26364803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible: an approach to cone beam computed tomography. López-Jarana P; Díaz-Castro CM; Falcão A; Falcão C; Ríos-Santos JV; Herrero-Climent M BMC Oral Health; 2018 Nov; 18(1):194. PubMed ID: 30463614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery. Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study. Ucar FI; Celebi AA; Tan E; Topcuoğlu T; Sekerci AE J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 28204849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Junqueira RB; Verner FS; Campos CN; Devito KL; do Carmo AM J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1620-4. PubMed ID: 24238460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Ok E; Altunsoy M; Nur BG; Aglarci OS; Çolak M; Güngör E Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):701-6. PubMed ID: 24832561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]