These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1002 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24697967)

  • 1. When to use the Bonferroni correction.
    Armstrong RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Sep; 34(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 24697967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical guidelines for clinical studies of human vision.
    Armstrong RA; Davies LN; Dunne MC; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Mar; 31(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 21309799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Citation patterns in the optometric and ophthalmologic clinical binocular vision literature.
    Goss DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 83(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 17164682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes.
    Armstrong RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 23252852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recommendations for analysis of repeated-measures designs: testing and correcting for sphericity and use of manova and mixed model analysis.
    Armstrong RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):585-593. PubMed ID: 28726257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ophthalmology and vision science research. Part 1: Understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices.
    Cartwright VA; McGhee CN
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1999-2007. PubMed ID: 16338574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure.
    Eichstaedt KE; Kovatch K; Maroof DA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 23648625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The problem of multiple testing and solutions for genome-wide studies].
    Gyorffy B; Gyorffy A; Tulassay Z
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Mar; 146(12):559-63. PubMed ID: 15853065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighted multiple testing correction for correlated tests.
    Xie C
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 22114000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of the use of multiple comparison corrections in ophthalmology research.
    Stacey AW; Pouly S; Czyz CN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 53(4):1830-4. PubMed ID: 22408004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple comparison procedures updated.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1998 Dec; 25(12):1032-7. PubMed ID: 9888002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonferroni-based correction factor for multiple, correlated endpoints.
    Shi Q; Pavey ES; Carter RE
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 22588983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.
    Cramer AO; van Ravenzwaaij D; Matzke D; Steingroever H; Wetzels R; Grasman RP; Waldorp LJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):640-7. PubMed ID: 26374437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of multiple hypothesis testing in otolaryngology literature.
    Kirkham EM; Weaver EM
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Mar; 125(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 25111574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiplicity-adjusted sample size requirements: a strategy to maintain statistical power with Bonferroni adjustments.
    Leon AC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 65(11):1511-4. PubMed ID: 15554764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of type I error for multiple test corrections in large single-nucleotide polymorphism studies using principal components versus haplotype blocking algorithms.
    Nicodemus KK; Liu W; Chase GA; Tsai YY; Fallin MD
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S78. PubMed ID: 16451692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing power while controlling family-wise error: an illustration of the issues using electrocortical studies.
    Yoder PJ; Blackford JU; Waller NG; Kim G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 May; 26(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 15512923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the multiple problems of multiplicity-whether and how to correct for many statistical tests.
    Streiner DL
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Oct; 102(4):721-8. PubMed ID: 26245806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.