239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699249)
1. DNA repair pathway selection caused by defects in TEL1, SAE2, and de novo telomere addition generates specific chromosomal rearrangement signatures.
Putnam CD; Pallis K; Hayes TK; Kolodner RD
PLoS Genet; 2014 Apr; 10(4):e1004277. PubMed ID: 24699249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Smith S; Hwang JY; Banerjee S; Majeed A; Gupta A; Myung K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jun; 101(24):9039-44. PubMed ID: 15184655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Myung K; Smith S; Kolodner RD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Nov; 101(45):15980-5. PubMed ID: 15514023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast.
Pennaneach V; Kolodner RD
Nat Genet; 2004 Jun; 36(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 15133512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Motegi A; Kuntz K; Majeed A; Smith S; Myung K
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 26(4):1424-33. PubMed ID: 16449653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Myung K; Kolodner RD
DNA Repair (Amst); 2003 Mar; 2(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 12547388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cdc73 suppresses genome instability by mediating telomere homeostasis.
Nene RV; Putnam CD; Li BZ; Nguyen KG; Srivatsan A; Campbell CS; Desai A; Kolodner RD
PLoS Genet; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1007170. PubMed ID: 29320491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms underlying genome instability mediated by formation of foldback inversions in
Li BZ; Putnam CD; Kolodner RD
Elife; 2020 Aug; 9():. PubMed ID: 32762846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Myung K; Chen C; Kolodner RD
Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6841):1073-6. PubMed ID: 11429610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
Argunhan B; Farmer S; Leung WK; Terentyev Y; Humphryes N; Tsubouchi T; Toyoizumi H; Tsubouchi H
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65875. PubMed ID: 23762445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resection and repair of a Cas9 double-strand break at CTG trinucleotide repeats induces local and extensive chromosomal deletions.
Mosbach V; Viterbo D; Descorps-Declère S; Poggi L; Vaysse-Zinkhöfer W; Richard GF
PLoS Genet; 2020 Jul; 16(7):e1008924. PubMed ID: 32673314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants.
Schmidt KH; Kolodner RD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Nov; 103(48):18196-201. PubMed ID: 17114288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosome aberrations resulting from double-strand DNA breaks at a naturally occurring yeast fragile site composed of inverted ty elements are independent of Mre11p and Sae2p.
Casper AM; Greenwell PW; Tang W; Petes TD
Genetics; 2009 Oct; 183(2):423-39, 1SI-26SI. PubMed ID: 19635935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements.
Chan JE; Kolodner RD
PLoS Genet; 2011 May; 7(5):e1002089. PubMed ID: 21637792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Rad1-Rad10 complex promotes the production of gross chromosomal rearrangements from spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hwang JY; Smith S; Myung K
Genetics; 2005 Apr; 169(4):1927-37. PubMed ID: 15687264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ontogeny of Unstable Chromosomes Generated by Telomere Error in Budding Yeast.
Beyer T; Weinert T
PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006345. PubMed ID: 27716774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased genome instability and telomere length in the elg1-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant are regulated by S-phase checkpoints.
Banerjee S; Myung K
Eukaryot Cell; 2004 Dec; 3(6):1557-66. PubMed ID: 15590829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sae2 Function at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Is Bypassed by Dampening Tel1 or Rad53 Activity.
Gobbini E; Villa M; Gnugnoli M; Menin L; Clerici M; Longhese MP
PLoS Genet; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1005685. PubMed ID: 26584331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1.
Rattray AJ; McGill CB; Shafer BK; Strathern JN
Genetics; 2001 May; 158(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 11333222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining.
Lee K; Lee SE
Genetics; 2007 Aug; 176(4):2003-14. PubMed ID: 17565964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
