332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699300)
1. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy plus external beam radiotherapy: a propensity-matched comparison.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Uccella S; Donadello N; Ghezzi F
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 110(7):893-8. PubMed ID: 25132470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery.
Bogani G; Rossetti D; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Leone C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e27. PubMed ID: 30740958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients.
Yang L; Cai J; Dong W; Shen Y; Xiong Z; Wang H; Min J; Li G; Wang Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 25281840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
