These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699300)

  • 21. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
    Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
    Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23737035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery.
    Laterza RM; Uccella S; Casarin J; Morosi C; Serati M; Koelbl H; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 26807638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic, open abdominal, and vaginal surgery for endometrial cancer in patients aged 80 years or older.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jun; 24(5):894-900. PubMed ID: 24819659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
    Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
    Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.