82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699343)
1. A new algorithm for calculating optimal viewing angles in coronary angiography based on 4-D cardiac computed tomography.
Chen X; Li J; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Jia Z; Pu K; Yu D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24699343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Global optimization of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary arteries with multiple segments.
Wang X; Yang J; Yang T; Wang Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2640-3. PubMed ID: 24110269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.
Green NE; Chen SY; Hansgen AR; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Carroll JD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Apr; 64(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 15744720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for characterizing human coronary artery deformation from cardiac-gated computed tomography data.
Choi G; Xiong G; Cheng CP; Taylor CA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Oct; 61(10):2582-92. PubMed ID: 24835123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography.
Preuhs A; Berger M; Bauer S; Redel T; Unberath M; Achenbach S; Maier A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 29858733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from X-ray coronary angiography.
Tu S; Hao P; Koning G; Wei X; Song X; Chen A; Reiber JH
EuroIntervention; 2011 May; 7(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21550911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical validation of the new T- and Y-shape models for the quantitative analysis of coronary bifurcations: an interobserver variability study.
Tuinenburg JC; Janssen JP; Kooistra R; Koning G; Corral MD; Lansky AJ; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):E225-36. PubMed ID: 22707289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic determination of differential coronary artery motion minima for cardiac computed tomography optimal phase selection.
Lessick J; Klass O; Wuchenauer S; Walker MJ; Schmitt H; Peters J; Weese J; Brunner H; Vembar M; Grass M; Aronson D; Hoffmann MH
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 25754800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation].
Kovacs A; Probst C; Sommer T; Leiss A; Nähle P; Welz A; Schild H; Flacke S
Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 16333788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of acquisition trajectories for 3D rotational coronary venography.
Bi J; Grass M; Schäfer D
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jan; 5(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 20033496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term prognostic effect of coronary atherosclerotic burden: validation of the computed tomography-Leaman score.
Mushtaq S; De Araujo Gonçalves P; Garcia-Garcia HM; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Bertella E; Campos CM; Pepi M; Serruys PW; Andreini D
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e002332. PubMed ID: 25666717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography.
Herzog C; Zwerner PL; Doll JR; Nielsen CD; Nguyen SA; Savino G; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17581898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.
Chen SJ; Carroll JD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Apr; 19(4):318-36. PubMed ID: 10909927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion estimation of 3D coronary vessel skeletons from X-ray angiographic sequences.
Zheng S; Qi Y
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Jul; 35(5):353-64. PubMed ID: 21227652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models.
Garcia JA; Movassaghi B; Casserly IP; Klein AJ; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Hansgen A; Wink O; Groves BM; Carroll JD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jun; 25(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 19101820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices.
Chen SY; Carroll JD; Messenger JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jul; 21(7):724-40. PubMed ID: 12374311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography.
Unzué Vallejo L; Delcán Domínguez JL; Alegría Barrero A; Medina Peralta J; Rodríguez Rodrigo FJ; Rodríguez-López JL
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 23218798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography.
Kirişli HA; Schaap M; Metz CT; Dharampal AS; Meijboom WB; Papadopoulou SL; Dedic A; Nieman K; de Graaf MA; Meijs MF; Cramer MJ; Broersen A; Cetin S; Eslami A; Flórez-Valencia L; Lor KL; Matuszewski B; Melki I; Mohr B; Oksüz I; Shahzad R; Wang C; Kitslaar PH; Unal G; Katouzian A; Örkisz M; Chen CM; Precioso F; Najman L; Masood S; Ünay D; van Vliet L; Moreno R; Goldenberg R; Vuçini E; Krestin GP; Niessen WJ; van Walsum T
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):859-76. PubMed ID: 23837963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
