120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699346)
1. Flexible methods for segmentation evaluation: results from CT-based luggage screening.
Karimi S; Jiang X; Cosman P; Martz H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 24699346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An approach for adaptive automatic threat recognition within 3D computed tomography images for baggage security screening.
Wang Q; Ismail KN; Breckon TP
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):35-58. PubMed ID: 31744038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metal artifact reduction for CT-based luggage screening.
Karimi S; Martz H; Cosman P
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):435-51. PubMed ID: 26410655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A reference architecture for plausible Threat Image Projection (TIP) within 3D X-ray computed tomography volumes.
Wang Q; Megherbi N; Breckon TP
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 32390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional lung tumor segmentation from x-ray computed tomography using sparse field active models.
Awad J; Owrangi A; Villemaire L; O'Riordan E; Parraga G; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):851-65. PubMed ID: 22320795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-Scale deep learning framework for cochlea localization, segmentation and analysis on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT images.
Heutink F; Koch V; Verbist B; van der Woude WJ; Mylanus E; Huinck W; Sechopoulos I; Caballo M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jul; 191():105387. PubMed ID: 32109685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning-based CT texture analysis to predict HPV status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of 2D and 3D segmentation.
Ren J; Yuan Y; Qi M; Tao X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6858-6866. PubMed ID: 32591885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue segmentation of head and neck CT images for treatment planning: a multiatlas approach combined with intensity modeling.
Fortunati V; Verhaart RF; van der Lijn F; Niessen WJ; Veenland JF; Paulides MM; van Walsum T
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071905. PubMed ID: 23822442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI-guided radiation planning in the pelvic region.
Arabi H; Dowling JA; Burgos N; Han X; Greer PB; Koutsouvelis N; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5218-5233. PubMed ID: 30216462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver tumor segmentation based on 3D convolutional neural network with dual scale.
Meng L; Tian Y; Bu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):144-157. PubMed ID: 31793212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated quantification and evaluation of motion artifact on coronary CT angiography images.
Ma H; Gros E; Baginski SG; Laste ZR; Kulkarni NM; Okerlund D; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5494-5508. PubMed ID: 30339290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast and automatic bone segmentation and registration of 3D ultrasound to CT for the full pelvic anatomy: a comparative study.
Pandey P; Guy P; Hodgson AJ; Abugharbieh R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 29804181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of a semi-automated contrast-oriented algorithm for tumor segmentation in retrospectively gated PET images: phantom and clinical validation.
Carles M; Fechter T; Nemer U; Nanko N; Mix M; Nestle U; Schaefer A
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9227-51. PubMed ID: 26576926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated 3D closed surface segmentation: application to vertebral body segmentation in CT images.
Liu S; Xie Y; Reeves AP
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 May; 11(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 26558791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets.
Heimann T; van Ginneken B; Styner MA; Arzhaeva Y; Aurich V; Bauer C; Beck A; Becker C; Beichel R; Bekes G; Bello F; Binnig G; Bischof H; Bornik A; Cashman PM; Chi Y; Cordova A; Dawant BM; Fidrich M; Furst JD; Furukawa D; Grenacher L; Hornegger J; Kainmüller D; Kitney RI; Kobatake H; Lamecker H; Lange T; Lee J; Lennon B; Li R; Li S; Meinzer HP; Nemeth G; Raicu DS; Rau AM; van Rikxoort EM; Rousson M; Rusko L; Saddi KA; Schmidt G; Seghers D; Shimizu A; Slagmolen P; Sorantin E; Soza G; Susomboon R; Waite JM; Wimmer A; Wolf I
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Aug; 28(8):1251-65. PubMed ID: 19211338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic Segmentation of Multiple Organs on 3D CT Images by Using Deep Learning Approaches.
Zhou X
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1213():135-147. PubMed ID: 32030668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape-intensity prior level set combining probabilistic atlas and probability map constrains for automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT images.
Wang J; Cheng Y; Guo C; Wang Y; Tamura S
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 May; 11(5):817-26. PubMed ID: 26646416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational pipeline for quantification of pulmonary infections in small animal models using serial PET-CT imaging.
Bagci U; Foster B; Miller-Jaster K; Luna B; Dey B; Bishai WR; Jonsson CB; Jain S; Mollura DJ
EJNMMI Res; 2013 Jul; 3(1):55. PubMed ID: 23879987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Snake model-based lymphoma segmentation for sequential CT images.
Chen Q; Quan F; Xu J; Rubin DL
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 23787027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
