These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699460)

  • 1. Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Boone D; Plumb A; Stoffel S; Morris S; Yao GL; Zhu S; Lilford R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    BMJ Open; 2014 Apr; 4(4):e004327. PubMed ID: 24699460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1477-86. PubMed ID: 24817084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating patients' preferences for type of bowel preparation prior to screening CT colonography: convenience and comfort versus sensitivity and specificity.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Boone D; Plumb A; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1140-5. PubMed ID: 23948662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.
    Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
    Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
    Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.
    Howard K; Salkeld G; Pignone M; Hewett P; Cheung P; Olsen J; Clapton W; Roberts-Thomson IC
    Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 22152186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
    Gut; 2012 Nov; 61(11):1552-9. PubMed ID: 22198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Grazzini G; Borgheresi A; Delsanto S; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Milani S; Pallanti S; Zappa M; Mascalchi M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2457-2464. PubMed ID: 30402705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.
    Jensch S; Bipat S; Peringa J; de Vries AH; Heutinck A; Dekker E; Baak LC; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 19626326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Willingness to Pay for CT Colonography: A Survey of Patient Preferences.
    Kaye AH; Zafar HM; Jha S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):355-8. PubMed ID: 26797363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
    Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
    Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening.
    Liedenbaum MH; van Rijn AF; de Vries AH; Dekker HM; Thomeer M; van Marrewijk CJ; Hol L; Dijkgraaf MG; Fockens P; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Gut; 2009 Sep; 58(9):1242-9. PubMed ID: 19625276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.
    Halligan S; Wooldrage K; Dadswell E; Kralj-Hans I; von Wagner C; Edwards R; Yao G; Kay C; Burling D; Faiz O; Teare J; Lilford RJ; Morton D; Wardle J; Atkin W;
    Lancet; 2013 Apr; 381(9873):1185-93. PubMed ID: 23414648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.
    Utano K; Takayanagi D; Nagata K; Aizawa M; Endo S; Nemoto T; Nemoto D; Isohata N; Lefor AK; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5236-5246. PubMed ID: 30903329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography in patients with screen-detected 6-9 mm polyps.
    Tutein Nolthenius CJ; Boellaard TN; de Haan MC; Nio CY; Thomeer MG; Bipat S; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Essink-Bot ML; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4000-4010. PubMed ID: 27059859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.
    Mulhall BP; Veerappan GR; Jackson JL
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Apr; 142(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 15838071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public perceptions and preferences for CT colonography or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
    Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Magee MS; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Oct; 89(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 22705250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population.
    Liedenbaum MH; de Vries AH; van Rijn AF; Dekker HM; Willemssen FE; van Leerdam ME; van Marrewijk CJ; Fockens P; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Dec; 35(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 19888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
    Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.