1615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699562)
41. Changes in macular thickness after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Shehadeh Mashor R; Nasser O; Sansanayudh W; Rootman DS; Slomovic AR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 159(3):415-8.e1. PubMed ID: 25447114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes.
Busin M; Madi S; Santorum P; Scorcia V; Beltz J
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 23466268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of a donor insertion device to sheets glide in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 3-year outcomes.
Ang M; Saroj L; Htoon HM; Kiew S; Mehta JS; Tan D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1163-1169.e3. PubMed ID: 24582993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Optical quality of the cornea after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
van Dijk K; Droutsas K; Hou J; Sangsari S; Liarakos VS; Melles GR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):71-79.e1. PubMed ID: 24784873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.
Gibbons A; Leung EH; Yoo SH
Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 30273621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Irregularity of the posterior corneal surface after curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Vetter JM; Butsch C; Faust M; Schmidtmann I; Hoffmann EM; Sekundo W; Pfeiffer N
Cornea; 2013 Feb; 32(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 23132446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Corneal sensation after descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Kumar RL; Koenig SB; Covert DJ
Cornea; 2010 Jan; 29(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19907297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Spontaneous corneal clearance despite graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Balachandran C; Ham L; Verschoor CA; Ong TS; van der Wees J; Melles GR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 148(2):227-234.e1. PubMed ID: 19442962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery).
Chaurasia S; Price FW; Gunderson L; Price MO
Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb; 121(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 24252821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Microthin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Matsou A; Pujari R; Sarwar H; Rana M; Myerscough J; Thomson SM; Nandakumar G; Zhang J; Rajan MS
Cornea; 2021 Sep; 40(9):1117-1125. PubMed ID: 33156076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Long-term Outcomes in Fellow Eyes Comparing DSAEK and DMEK for Treatment of Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy.
Weisenthal RW; Yin HY; Jarstad AR; Wang D; Verdier DD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 233():216-226. PubMed ID: 34157279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure.
Terry MA; Shamie N; Chen ES; Phillips PM; Shah AK; Hoar KL; Friend DJ
Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):631-9. PubMed ID: 19201480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patterns of corneal endothelialization and corneal clearance after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
Dirisamer M; Dapena I; Ham L; van Dijk K; Oganes O; Frank LE; van der Wees J; Melles GR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 152(4):543-555.e1. PubMed ID: 21726849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Larger Descemetorhexis to Improve Graft Adhesion in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Does Not Cause Postoperative Peripheral Corneal Edema.
Tourtas T; Weller JM; Bachmann BO; Kruse FE
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Nov; 41(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 26217874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison.
Viberg A; Samolov B; Byström B
Ophthalmology; 2023 Dec; 130(12):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 37517576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. One-year outcomes in eyes remaining phakic after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Burkhart ZN; Feng MT; Price FW; Price MO
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 24417895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Faramarzi A; Feizi S; Najdi D; Ghiasian L; Karimian F
Cornea; 2016 Jan; 35(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26555584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Novel technique for the preparation of corneal grafts for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Muraine M; Gueudry J; He Z; Piselli S; Lefevre S; Toubeau D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 156(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 23932263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Maier AK; Gundlach E; Gonnermann J; Klamann MK; Bertelmann E; Rieck PW; Joussen AM; Torun N
Eye (Lond); 2015 Mar; 29(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 25412715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
