These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699974)

  • 1. Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Lindner HY; Eliasson AC; Hermansson LM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24699974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability and rater agreements of assessment of capacity for myoelectric control version 2.0.
    Lindner HY; Langius-Eklöf A; Hermansson LM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 25144176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control.
    Hermansson LM; Fisher AG; Bernspång B; Eliasson AC
    J Rehabil Med; 2005 May; 37(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 16040474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study.
    Widehammar C; Pettersson I; Janeslätt G; Hermansson L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28470129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the revolutionizing prosthetics modular prosthetic limb system for upper extremity amputees.
    Yu KE; Perry BN; Moran CW; Armiger RS; Johannes MS; Hawkins A; Stentz L; Vandersea J; Tsao JW; Pasquina PF
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):954. PubMed ID: 33441604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb.
    Buffart LM; Roebroeck ME; van Heijningen VG; Pesch-Batenburg JM; Stam HJ
    J Rehabil Med; 2007 May; 39(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 17549329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control.
    Hermansson LM; Bodin L; Eliasson AC
    J Rehabil Med; 2006 Mar; 38(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16546769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between capacity and performance in paediatric upper limb prosthesis users.
    Lindner H; Hiyoshi A; Hermansson L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 28639478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorization of compensatory motions in transradial myoelectric prosthesis users.
    Hussaini A; Zinck A; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 27473642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks.
    Thies SB; Kenney LP; Sobuh M; Galpin A; Kyberd P; Stine R; Major MJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():137-143. PubMed ID: 28684214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Lee C; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Jul; 97():105713. PubMed ID: 35809535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
    Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 33933105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visualisation of upper limb activity using spirals: A new approach to the assessment of daily prosthesis usage.
    Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat M; Thies S; Head JS; Galpin A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28650213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: evaluation of construct and rating scale.
    Lindner HY; Linacre JM; Norling Hermansson LM
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 May; 41(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 19479160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychosocial adjustment in Swedish children with upper-limb reduction deficiency and a myoelectric prosthetic hand.
    Hermansson L; Eliasson AC; Engström I
    Acta Paediatr; 2005 Apr; 94(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 16092464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of early myoelectric prosthesis fittings: A prospective case-control study.
    Sjöberg L; Lindner H; Hermansson L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):527-533. PubMed ID: 28905686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.