These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24699974)
21. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ; J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. Segil JL; Controzzi M; Weir RF; Cipriani C J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(9):1439-54. PubMed ID: 25803683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance. Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat MH; Thies S; Head J; Galpin A; Baker R; Kulkarni J Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11084. PubMed ID: 30038402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of multi-grip myoelectric prosthetic hands on daily activities, pain-related disability and prosthesis use compared with single-grip myoelectric prostheses: A single-case study. Widehammar C; Hiyoshi A; Lidström Holmqvist K; Lindner H; Hermansson L J Rehabil Med; 2022 Jan; 54():jrm00245. PubMed ID: 34766184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intermanual Transfer Effects in Below-Elbow Myoelectric Prosthesis Users. de Boer E; Romkema S; Cutti AG; Brouwers MA; Bongers RM; van der Sluis CK Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 97(11):1924-1930. PubMed ID: 27240431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Functional benefit of an adaptive myoelectric prosthetic hand compared to a conventional myoelectric hand. Bergman K; Ornholmer L; Zackrisson K; Thyberg M Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Apr; 16(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 1584641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Functionality of i-LIMB and i-LIMB pulse hands: case report. van der Niet O; Bongers RM; van der Sluis CK J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(8):1123-8. PubMed ID: 24458898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Functional assessment of current upper limb prostheses: An integrated clinical and technological perspective. Capsi-Morales P; Piazza C; Sjoberg L; Catalano MG; Grioli G; Bicchi A; Hermansson LM PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289978. PubMed ID: 37585427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis and Design of a Bypass Socket for Transradial Amputations. Musolf BM; Earley EJ; Munoz-Novoa M; Ortiz-Catalan M Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4611-4614. PubMed ID: 34892241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. Engdahl SM; Christie BP; Kelly B; Davis A; Chestek CA; Gates DH J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():53. PubMed ID: 26071402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis. Godfrey SB; Zhao KD; Theuer A; Catalano MG; Bianchi M; Breighner R; Bhaskaran D; Lennon R; Grioli G; Santello M; Bicchi A; Andrews K PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205653. PubMed ID: 30321204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A multifaceted suite of metrics for comparative myoelectric prosthesis controller research. Williams HE; Shehata AW; Cheng KY; Hebert JS; Pilarski PM PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0291279. PubMed ID: 38739557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1442-6. PubMed ID: 20801265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Developing a Novel Prosthetic Hand with Wireless Wearable Sensor Technology Based on User Perspectives: A Pilot Study. Shimizu Y; Mori T; Yoshikawa K; Katane D; Torishima H; Hara Y; Yozu A; Yamazaki M; Hada Y; Mutsuzaki H Sensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 38732871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. User Performance With a Transradial Multi-Articulating Hand Prosthesis During Pattern Recognition and Direct Control Home Use. Simon AM; Turner KL; Miller LA; Potter BK; Beachler MD; Dumanian GA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():271-281. PubMed ID: 36355739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implications of EMG channel count: enhancing pattern recognition online prosthetic testing. Simon AM; Newkirk K; Miller LA; Turner KL; Brenner K; Stephens M; Hargrove LJ Front Rehabil Sci; 2024; 5():1345364. PubMed ID: 38500790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Routhier F; Vincent C; Morissette MJ; Desaulniers L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11573879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individualizing goals for users of externally powered partial hand prostheses. Whelan L; Flinn S; Wagner N J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(6):885-94. PubMed ID: 25478950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jul; 25(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 20362374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]