112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24700834)
1. Stem cell research. RIKEN panel finds misconduct in controversial paper.
Normile D
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):23. PubMed ID: 24700834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):283. PubMed ID: 24646974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell biology. STAP cells succumb to pressure.
Normile D; Vogel G
Science; 2014 Jun; 344(6189):1215-6. PubMed ID: 24925996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. STAP retracted.
Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7507):5-6. PubMed ID: 24999504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific integrity. Questions about Japanese researcher go back years.
Couzin-Frankel J; Normile D
Science; 2012 Oct; 338(6106):452-4. PubMed ID: 23112303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Japan. RIKEN shrinks troubled center.
Normile D
Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6201):1110. PubMed ID: 25190773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct. Falsification charge highlights image-manipulation standards.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):356. PubMed ID: 18927360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research integrity: Cell-induced stress.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7508):140-3. PubMed ID: 25008506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
Fuyuno I
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
Tavare A
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
