These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24701455)

  • 1. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in cone-beam CT.
    Kim DS; Rashsuren O; Kim EK
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Mar; 44(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24701455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
    Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
    Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
    Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
    Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
    Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT.
    Jeong DK; Lee SC; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Jun; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22783473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
    Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new formula for converting dose-area product to effective dose in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pauwels R
    Phys Med; 2023 Aug; 112():102639. PubMed ID: 37441822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
    Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of dental cone-beam CT dose conversion coefficients.
    Mah E; Ritenour ER; Yao H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200225. PubMed ID: 33112658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring cone-beam CT radiation dose levels in a University Hospital.
    Brasil DM; Merken K; Binst J; Bosmans H; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Feb; 52(3):20220213. PubMed ID: 36802857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration.
    Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21239575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective dose assessment in the maxillofacial region using thermoluminescent (TLD) and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosemeters: a comparative study.
    Koivisto J; Schulze D; Wolff J; Rottke D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(8):20140202. PubMed ID: 25143020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry.
    Shin HS; Nam KC; Park H; Choi HU; Kim HY; Park CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20130439. PubMed ID: 24845340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
    Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
    Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.