These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24701812)
1. [Diagnostic difficulties in a case of constricted tubular visual field]. Dogaru OM; Rusu M; Hâncu D; Horvath K Oftalmologia; 2013; 57(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 24701812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional visual disturbance due to hysteria. Lai HC; Lin KK; Yang ML; Chen HS Chang Gung Med J; 2007; 30(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 17477034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Neurology of hysteria (conversion disorder)]. Sonoo M Brain Nerve; 2014 Jul; 66(7):863-71. PubMed ID: 24998831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of practical tests for ocular malingering and hysteria. Miller BW Surv Ophthalmol; 1973; 17(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 4802377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The prognosis of patients with hysterical visual impairment. Sletteberg O; Bertelsen T; Høvding G Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Apr; 67(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 2728867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central corneal pachymetry and visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Kim JW; Chen PP Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 15522381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuro-ophthalmic signs and symptoms of hysteria. Keane JR Neurology; 1982 Jul; 32(7):757-62. PubMed ID: 7201113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Signal/noise ratios to compare tests for measuring visual field progression. Ernest PJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6893; author reply 6893-4. PubMed ID: 21123778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression. Artes PH; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of some unusual and difficult visual field defects. Harrington DO Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1972; 92():15-30. PubMed ID: 4515507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. Wilensky JT; Hawkins A Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of resource utilization in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma between two cities in Finland: is more better? Hagman J Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 91 Thesis 3():1-47. PubMed ID: 23621767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]