178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24702084)
1. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressings.
Loftus MJ; Florescu CJ; Stuart RL
Med J Aust; 2014 Apr; 200(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 24702084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 2: paediatric intensive care.
Franklin N
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S21. PubMed ID: 25373254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 3: paediatric care.
Whitton J
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S22. PubMed ID: 25373255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevention of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections through chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloth bathing in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised crossover trials.
Afonso E; Blot K; Blot S
Euro Surveill; 2016 Nov; 21(46):. PubMed ID: 27918269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.
Arvaniti K; Lathyris D; Clouva-Molyvdas P; Haidich AB; Mouloudi E; Synnefaki E; Koulourida V; Georgopoulos D; Gerogianni N; Nakos G; Matamis D;
Crit Care Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):420-9. PubMed ID: 21926583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study.
Schwebel C; Lucet JC; Vesin A; Arrault X; Calvino-Gunther S; Bouadma L; Timsit JF
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21926570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Central line-associated bloodstream infections: prevention and management.
Weber DJ; Rutala WA
Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 25(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 21315995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic impact of use of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of central line-associated infections in the United States.
Ye X; Rupnow M; Bastide P; Lafuma A; Ovington L; Jarvis WR
Am J Infect Control; 2011 Oct; 39(8):647-654. PubMed ID: 21641681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A meta-analysis dealing with the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and silver-sufhadiazine impregnated central venous catheters.
Haxhe JJ; D'Hoore W
J Hosp Infect; 1998 Oct; 40(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 9819700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococcal nosocomial bloodstream isolates to the chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheter.
Rosato AE; Tallent SM; Edmond MB; Bearman GM
Am J Infect Control; 2004 Dec; 32(8):486-8. PubMed ID: 15573055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The bundle "plus": the effect of a multidisciplinary team approach to eradicate central line-associated bloodstream infections.
Walz JM; Ellison RT; Mack DA; Flaherty HM; McIlwaine JK; Whyte KG; Landry KE; Baker SP; Heard SO;
Anesth Analg; 2015 Apr; 120(4):868-76. PubMed ID: 24149581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chlorhexidine gluconate–impregnated central access catheter dressings as a cause of erosive contact dermatitis: a report of 7 cases.
Weitz NA; Lauren CT; Weiser JA; LeBoeuf NR; Grossman ME; Biagas K; Garzon MC; Morel KD
JAMA Dermatol; 2013 Feb; 149(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 23560299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in infection prevention practices for peripherally inserted central venous catheters: A survey of neonatal units in England and Wales.
Fraser C; Harron K; Dalton L; Gilbert R; Oddie SJ;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0204894. PubMed ID: 30383769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 1: renal setting.
Nicholls M
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S20-1. PubMed ID: 25373253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Timsit JF; Schwebel C; Bouadma L; Geffroy A; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Pease S; Herault MC; Haouache H; Calvino-Gunther S; Gestin B; Armand-Lefevre L; Leflon V; Chaplain C; Benali A; Francais A; Adrie C; Zahar JR; Thuong M; Arrault X; Croize J; Lucet JC;
JAMA; 2009 Mar; 301(12):1231-41. PubMed ID: 19318651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of chlorhexidine gluconate for central venous catheter site care at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Balamongkhon B; Thamlikitkul V
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Nov; 35(9):585-8. PubMed ID: 17980236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlorhexidine-impregnated intravascular catheter sponge dressings: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Rupp ME
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):296-8. PubMed ID: 22179345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better?
Buetti N; Ruckly S; Schwebel C; Mimoz O; Souweine B; Lucet JC; Timsit JF
Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):458. PubMed ID: 32703235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters are efficient even at subclavian sites without tracheostomy.
Lorente L; Lecuona M; Jiménez A; Cabrera J; Santacreu R; Lorenzo L; Raja L; Mora ML
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1526-1529. PubMed ID: 27378009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prevention of catheter-related sepsis].
Gastmeier P
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2014 May; 109(4):225. PubMed ID: 24936635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
