260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24702544)
1. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix by interposition of a synthetic reference material.
Hee L; Sandager P; Petersen O; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1244-9. PubMed ID: 24032689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Elastography of cervix to predict delay from induction to delivery].
Sonnier L; Bouhanna P; Arnou C; Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Dec; 42(12):827-31. PubMed ID: 25458805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.
Hwang HS; Sohn IS; Kwon HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jun; 32(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 23716514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical ultrasonography versus Bishop score as a predictor of vaginal delivery].
Aragão JR; Feitosa FE; Alencar CA; Vasconcelos RP; de Amorim MM; Passini R
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 33(11):361-6. PubMed ID: 22267115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative strain elastography of the uterine cervix assessed by the GE Voluson E10 system in combination with a force-measuring device.
Rohr Thomsen C; Leonhard AK; Strandbo Schmidt Jensen M; Bor P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N; Sandager P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2213797. PubMed ID: 37202178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; De Smet F; De Moor B; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 16817172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.
Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Schmitz R
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Feb; 36(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24557633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
