These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24702544)

  • 21. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.
    Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Schmitz R
    Ultraschall Med; 2015 Feb; 36(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24557633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Elastography assessment of the cervix during cervical maturation].
    Kaouther D; Olivier A
    Tunis Med; 2014 Jul; 92(7):448-51. PubMed ID: 25775282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sonoelastography as method for preliminary evaluation of uterine cervix to predict success of induction of labor.
    Muscatello A; Di Nicola M; Accurti V; Mastrocola N; Franchi V; Colagrande I; Patacchiola F; Carta G
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2014; 35(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24247111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?
    Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
    Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
    Kolkman DG; Verhoeven CJ; Brinkhorst SJ; van der Post JA; Pajkrt E; Opmeer BC; Mol BW
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Sep; 30(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 23283806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements.
    Pitarello Pda R; Tadashi Yoshizaki C; Ruano R; Zugaib M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Feb; 41(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 22532400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix.
    Thomsen CR; Jensen MSS; Leonhard AK; Mortensen TØ; Bor P; Sandager P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 35049047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor.
    Yang SH; Roh CR; Kim JH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Mar; 23(3):375-82, quiz 384-5. PubMed ID: 15055785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Hertzian contact mechanics based formulation to improve ultrasound elastography assessment of uterine cervical tissue stiffness.
    Briggs BN; Stender ME; Muljadi PM; Donnelly MA; Winn VD; Ferguson VL
    J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1524-32. PubMed ID: 26003483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable.
    Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 15170797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A way to lend objectivity to Bishop score.
    Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 May; 26(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 16753679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography.
    Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The degree of cervical length shortening as a predictor of successful or failed labor induction.
    Kwon JY; Wie JH; Choi SK; Park S; Kim SM; Park IY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):503-508. PubMed ID: 33966736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of the predictive value of digital examination (Bishop's score) and ultrasound evaluation for labor induction success].
    Sieroszewski P; Banach R
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Feb; 81(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 20232707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.