817 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24703282)
1. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models.
Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of severe class II skeletal discrepancy with fixed twin block and high pull headgear--a case report.
Patel D; Parekh H; Gupta B; Purl T
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25745711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion.
Azevedo AR; Janson G; Henriques JF; Freitas MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 16527633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
Georgalis K; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
