251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24703443)
1. Complications associated with posterior approaches in minimally invasive spine decompression.
Stadler JA; Wong AP; Graham RB; Liu JC
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 24703443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report.
Donnelly DJ; Abd-El-Barr MM; Lu Y
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 26100166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thoracoscopic spine surgery for decompression and stabilization of the anterolateral thoracolumbar spine.
Amini A; Beisse R; Schmidt MH
Neurosurg Focus; 2005 Dec; 19(6):E4. PubMed ID: 16398481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery.
Kim CW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26 Suppl):S281-6. PubMed ID: 21160391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation.
Armin SS; Holly LT; Khoo LT
Neurosurg Focus; 2008; 25(2):E11. PubMed ID: 18673040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive surgery for the lumbar spine.
Gandhi SD; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Sci; 2012 Mar; 56(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22415380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive 2-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: preliminary clinical results.
Holly LT; Moftakhar P; Khoo LT; Wang JC; Shamie N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 17285047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Spine Lumbar Decompression and Dural Repair Through Tubular Retractors.
Boukebir MA; Berlin CD; Navarro-Ramirez R; Heiland T; Schöller K; Rawanduzy C; Kirnaz S; Jada A; Härtl R
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2017 Apr; 13(2):232-245. PubMed ID: 28927213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: pitfalls and complication avoidance.
Graham RB; Wong AP; Liu JC
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 24703442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Stadler JA; Hu XY; Yan JZ; Li XF; Lee JH; Khoo LT
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304. PubMed ID: 24703447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion?
Fourney DR; Dettori JR; Norvell DC; Dekutoski MB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9 Suppl):S57-65. PubMed ID: 20407352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive cervical spine foraminotomy and lateral mass screw placement.
Mikhael MM; Celestre PC; Wolf CF; Mroz TE; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(5):E318-22. PubMed ID: 22024895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new full-endoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients.
Ruetten S; Komp M; Merk H; Godolias G
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Aug; 50(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 17948181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lawrence MM; Hayek SM
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral interbody fusion.
Stadler JA; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Koski TR
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 24703455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
