These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24703462)
21. Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy. Ankem MK; Lowry PS; Slovick RW; Munoz del Rio A; Nakada SY Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 15351558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exaggerated primary endoscope deflection: initial clinical experience with prototype flexible ureteroscopes. Johnson GB; Grasso M BJU Int; 2004 Jan; 93(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 14678380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rapid communication: effects of Steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes. Abraham JB; Abdelshehid CS; Lee HJ; Box GN; Deane LA; Le T; Jellison F; Borin JF; Manipon A; McDougall EM; Clayman RV J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):985-92. PubMed ID: 17941773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool. Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible ureteroscopes. Auge BK; Sekula JJ; Springhart WP; Zhu S; Zhong P; Preminger GM J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):967-70. PubMed ID: 15311011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ureteric access with flexible ureteroscopes: effect of the size of the ureteroscope. Hudson RG; Conlin MJ; Bagley DH BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1043-4. PubMed ID: 15839928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the pressure leak test in increasing the lifespan of flexible ureteroscopes. Khan F; Mukhtar S; Marsh H; Anjum F; Madaan S; Dickinson IK; Sriprasad S Int J Clin Pract; 2013 Oct; 67(10):1040-3. PubMed ID: 24073976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. Defidio L; De Dominicis M; Di Gianfrancesco L; Fuchs G; Patel A J Endourol; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1329-34. PubMed ID: 22563938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Knudsen B; Miyaoka R; Shah K; Holden T; Turk TM; Pedro RN; Kriedberg C; Hinck B; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Monga M Urology; 2010 Mar; 75(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 19854494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 μm Holmium Laser Fiber. Leveillee RJ; Kelly EF J Endourol Case Rep; 2016; 2(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 27579436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach. Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Traxer O; Dubosq F; Jamali K; Gattegno B; Thibault P Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):276-9; discussion 280-1. PubMed ID: 16904434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Initial Experience and Clinical Assessment of the Karl Storz FLEX-XC1 Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope. Alamiri J; Qi R; Hanna KF; White LA; Ungerer GN; Kemble JP; Thompson CA; Potretzke AM; Koo K Urol Pract; 2024 May; 11(3):462-468. PubMed ID: 38526412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course. Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison. Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ureteral access sheath for the management of pediatric renal and ureteral stones: a single center experience. Singh A; Shah G; Young J; Sheridan M; Haas G; Upadhyay J J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1080-2; discussion 1082. PubMed ID: 16469623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]