376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24703828)
1. Biomechanical behavior of MRI-signal-inducing bone cements after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral bodies: An experimental cadaver study.
Wichlas F; Trzenschik H; Tsitsilonis S; Rohlmann A; Bail HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 May; 29(5):571-6. PubMed ID: 24703828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Lu Q; Liu C; Wang D; Liu H; Yang H; Yang L
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1871-1884. PubMed ID: 31202837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.
Bai B; Jazrawi LM; Kummer FJ; Spivak JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Aug; 24(15):1521-6. PubMed ID: 10457570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertebroplasty comparing injectable calcium phosphate cement compared with polymethylmethacrylate in a unique canine vertebral body large defect model.
Turner TM; Urban RM; Singh K; Hall DJ; Renner SM; Lim TH; Tomlinson MJ; An HS
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):482-7. PubMed ID: 18455113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1537-41. PubMed ID: 11462082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Cho W; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20065863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.
Kinzl M; Benneker LM; Boger A; Zysset PK; Pahr DH
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 22170449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short- and long-term effects of vertebroplastic bone cement on cancellous bone.
Quan R; Ni Y; Zhang L; Xu J; Zheng X; Yang D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():102-10. PubMed ID: 24762857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of low-modulus and standard acrylic bone cements in simulated vertebroplasty: A human ex vivo study.
Holub O; López A; Borse V; Engqvist H; Kapur N; Hall RM; Persson C
J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3258-66. PubMed ID: 26189096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.
Boger A; Heini P; Windolf M; Schneider E
Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17713795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling.
Peng Y; Du X; Huang L; Li J; Zhan R; Wang W; Xu B; Wu S; Peng C; Chen S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Nov; 56(11):2137-2150. PubMed ID: 29806053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cement augmentation on the spine : Biomechanical considerations].
Kolb JP; Weiser L; Kueny RA; Huber G; Rueger JM; Lehmann W
Orthopade; 2015 Sep; 44(9):672-680. PubMed ID: 26193968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation.
Zhang L; Yang G; Wu L; Yu B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Feb; 25(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 19917516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1542-6. PubMed ID: 11462083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture.
Tomita S; Kin A; Yazu M; Abe M
J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 12665956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Sun K; Liebschner MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul; 29(13):1428-35; discusssion 1435. PubMed ID: 15223933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
