543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24704082)
41. In-Ceram failure behavior and core-veneer interface quality as influenced by residual infiltration glass.
Carrier DD; Kelly JR
J Prosthodont; 1995 Dec; 4(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 8601181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of core:dentin thickness ratio on the bi-axial flexure strength and fracture mode and origin of bilayered dental ceramic composites.
Fleming GJ; El-Lakwah SF; Harris JJ; Marquis PM
Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 15681015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Bi-axial flexure strength and fracture mode of alumina glass-infiltrated core/veneer ceramic composites].
Cui J; Liu XH; Ma L; Jia L; Chao YL
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Apr; 19(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 20485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of surface treatments on adhesion of low-fusing porcelain to titanium as determined by strain energy release rate.
Elsaka SE; Swain MV
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1213-20. PubMed ID: 21975306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effects of simulated clinical grinding and subsequent heat treatment on microcrack healing of a lithium disilicate ceramic.
Hung CY; Lai YL; Hsieh YL; Chi LY; Lee SY
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):496-8. PubMed ID: 19149064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Finite element analysis to compare stress distribution of gold alloy, lithium-disilicate reinforced glass ceramic and zirconia based fixed partial denture.
Zheng Z; Lin J; Shinya A; Matinlinna JP; Botelho MG; Shinya A
J Investig Clin Dent; 2012 Nov; 3(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 22977016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fracture mechanics analyses of ceramic/veneer interface under mixed-mode loading.
Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():119-28. PubMed ID: 25123435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
Isgrò G; Pallav P; van der Zel JM; Feilzer AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 14586311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of veneer application on fracture behavior of lithium-disilicate-based ceramic crowns.
Zhao K; Pan Y; Guess PC; Zhang XP; Swain MV
Dent Mater; 2012 Jun; 28(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 22456006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics.
Fischer H; Schäfer M; Marx R
J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):972-5. PubMed ID: 14630897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of etching time and resin bond on the flexural strength of IPS e.max Press glass ceramic.
Xiaoping L; Dongfeng R; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e330-6. PubMed ID: 25189110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of experimental coating to improve the zirconia-veneering ceramic bond strength.
Matani JD; Kheur M; Jambhekar SS; Bhargava P; Londhe A
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):626-33. PubMed ID: 24975232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic and composite resin.
Fabianelli A; Pollington S; Papacchini F; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Ferrari M; van Noort R
J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19744537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Fracture strength of minimally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service.
Skouridou N; Pollington S; Rosentritt M; Tsitrou E
Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):e70-7. PubMed ID: 23618556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
