These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24704490)

  • 1. Species-specific response-topography of chickens' and pigeons' water-induced autoshaped responding.
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():5-11. PubMed ID: 24704490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of US identity on elimination and recovery of autoshaped responding with explicitly unpaired and degraded contingency extinction procedures.
    Colwill RM
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17045760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autoshaped key pecking maintained by access to a social space.
    Peele DB; Ferster CB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 7130895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autoshaped choice in artificial neural networks: implications for behavioral economics and neuroeconomics.
    Burgos JE; García-Leal Ó
    Behav Processes; 2015 May; 114():63-71. PubMed ID: 25662745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The associative relation underlying autoshaping in the pigeon.
    Woodruff G; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16811924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.
    Saggerson AL; George DN; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 16045384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superstition revisited: Sex, species, and adventitious reinforcement.
    Fernandez EJ; Timberlake W
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():103979. PubMed ID: 31722232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response-independent reinforcement.
    Epstein R; Skinner BF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1980 Oct; 77(10):6251-3. PubMed ID: 6934550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superconditioning from a reduced reinforcer.
    Rescorla RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Apr; 57(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 15204113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autoshaping and paleostriatal lesions in the pigeon.
    Mitchell JA
    Physiol Behav; 1983 Jul; 31(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 6634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imitation of conditional discriminations in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Dorrance BR; Zentall TR
    J Comp Psychol; 2002 Sep; 116(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12234078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation and the pairing hypothesis.
    Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Sep; 67(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15240049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetrical interactions in the perception of face identity and emotional expression are not unique to the primate visual system.
    Soto FA; Wasserman EA
    J Vis; 2011 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 21454855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.
    Gibson BM; Juricevic I; Shettleworth SJ; Pratt J; Klein RM
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 16396077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans.
    Navarro AD; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15762377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.
    Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():91-102. PubMed ID: 23954832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons.
    Leitenberg H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 5932107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.