488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24704884)
21. Variability of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to lignocellulose hydrolysate.
Modig T; Almeida JR; Gorwa-Grauslund MF; Lidén G
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Jun; 100(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 18438882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review.
Parawira W; Tekere M
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 31(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 20513164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains representing potentials for bioethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke by consolidated bioprocessing.
Hu N; Yuan B; Sun J; Wang SA; Li FL
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Sep; 95(5):1359-68. PubMed ID: 22760784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening of natural yeast isolates under the effects of stresses associated with second-generation biofuel production.
Dubey R; Jakeer S; Gaur NA
J Biosci Bioeng; 2016 May; 121(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 26481160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Sonderegger M; Jeppsson M; Larsson C; Gorwa-Grauslund MF; Boles E; Olsson L; Spencer-Martins I; Hahn-Hägerdal B; Sauer U
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jul; 87(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 15211492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Challenges for the production of bioethanol from biomass using recombinant yeasts.
Kricka W; Fitzpatrick J; Bond U
Adv Appl Microbiol; 2015; 92():89-125. PubMed ID: 26003934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. GRE2 from Scheffersomyces stipitis as an aldehyde reductase contributes tolerance to aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic biomass.
Wang X; Ma M; Liu ZL; Xiang Q; Li X; Liu N; Zhang X
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Aug; 100(15):6671-6682. PubMed ID: 27003269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethanol fermentation from non-detoxified lignocellulose hydrolysate by a multi-stress tolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes mutant.
Zhao M; Shi D; Lu X; Zong H; Zhuge B; Ji H
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Feb; 273():634-640. PubMed ID: 30502643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethanol production using whole plant biomass of Jerusalem artichoke by Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS1555.
Kim S; Park JM; Kim CH
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2013 Mar; 169(5):1531-45. PubMed ID: 23322254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural.
Fujitomi K; Sanda T; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
Bioresour Technol; 2012 May; 111():161-6. PubMed ID: 22357292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production.
Ruyters S; Mukherjee V; Verstrepen KJ; Thevelein JM; Willems KA; Lievens B
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 25413210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Looking beyond Saccharomyces: the potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation.
Radecka D; Mukherjee V; Mateo RQ; Stojiljkovic M; Foulquié-Moreno MR; Thevelein JM
FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 Sep; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 26126524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pervaporation of ethanol from lignocellulosic fermentation broth.
Gaykawad SS; Zha Y; Punt PJ; van Groenestijn JW; van der Wielen LA; Straathof AJ
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 129():469-76. PubMed ID: 23266848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of different dilute solution explosions pretreatment for conversion of distillers' grains into ethanol.
Zhang J; Zhang WX; Wu ZY; Yang J; Liu YH; Zhong X; Deng Y
Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2013; 43(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 23215651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Inhibitors and their effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and relevant countermeasures in bioprocess of ethanol production from lignocellulose--a review].
Li H; Zhang X; Shen Y; Dong Y; Bao X
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2009 Sep; 25(9):1321-8. PubMed ID: 19938474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative assessment of DNA damage in the industrial ethanol production strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2.
Silva PC; Domingues L; Collins T; Oliveira R; Johansson B
FEMS Yeast Res; 2018 Dec; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 30219865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preparation and evaluation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates for growth by ethanologenic yeasts.
Zha Y; Slomp R; van Groenestijn J; Punt PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 834():245-59. PubMed ID: 22144364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors.
Liu ZL
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 73(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17028874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Metabolomic analysis reveals key metabolites related to the rapid adaptation of Saccharomyce cerevisiae to multiple inhibitors of furfural, acetic acid, and phenol.
Wang X; Li BZ; Ding MZ; Zhang WW; Yuan YJ
OMICS; 2013 Mar; 17(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 23421908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains.
Hahn-Hägerdal B; Karhumaa K; Fonseca C; Spencer-Martins I; Gorwa-Grauslund MF
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 74(5):937-53. PubMed ID: 17294186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
