These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24705270)

  • 1. Corticospinal activity during dual tasking: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS literature from 1995 to 2013.
    Corp DT; Lum JA; Tooley GA; Pearce AJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Jun; 43():74-87. PubMed ID: 24705270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex.
    Corp DT; Rogers MA; Youssef GJ; Pearce AJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 26514811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced motor cortex inhibition and a 'cognitive-first' prioritisation strategy for older adults during dual-tasking.
    Corp DT; Youssef GJ; Clark RA; Gomes-Osman J; Yücel MA; Oldham SJ; Aldraiwiesh S; Rice J; Pascual-Leone A; Rogers MA
    Exp Gerontol; 2018 Nov; 113():95-105. PubMed ID: 30261247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in corticospinal motor excitability induced by non-motor linguistic tasks.
    Papathanasiou I; Filipović SR; Whurr R; Rothwell JC; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 14534770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs.
    Pötter-Nerger M; Fischer S; Mastroeni C; Groppa S; Deuschl G; Volkmann J; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3180-90. PubMed ID: 19726723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectancy induces dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability.
    van Elswijk G; Kleine BU; Overeem S; Stegeman DF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 17214569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dissanayaka TD; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Rev Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 28889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Counterfactual thinking affects the excitability of the motor cortex.
    Vicario CM; Rafal RD; Avenanti A
    Cortex; 2015 Apr; 65():139-48. PubMed ID: 25698657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corticospinal responses following strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kidgell DJ; Bonanno DR; Frazer AK; Howatson G; Pearce AJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46(11):2648-2661. PubMed ID: 28921683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient motor evoked potential suppression following a complex sensorimotor task.
    McDonnell MN; Ridding MC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 16600678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.
    Stinear CM; Byblow WD
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 14997259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain State-Dependent Transcranial Magnetic Closed-Loop Stimulation Controlled by Sensorimotor Desynchronization Induces Robust Increase of Corticospinal Excitability.
    Kraus D; Naros G; Bauer R; Khademi F; Leão MT; Ziemann U; Gharabaghi A
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 26970878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cavaleri R; Schabrun SM; Chipchase LS
    Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 4():107. PubMed ID: 26260518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning.
    Garry MI; Kamen G; Nordstrom MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1570-8. PubMed ID: 14627660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chung SW; Hill AT; Rogasch NC; Hoy KE; Fitzgerald PB
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2016 Apr; 63():43-64. PubMed ID: 26850210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I-wave periodicity transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) on corticospinal excitability. A systematic review of the literature.
    Kidgell DJ; Mason J; Frazer A; Pearce AJ
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():262-72. PubMed ID: 26917270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex.
    Di Lazzaro V; Ranieri F; Profice P; Pilato F; Mazzone P; Capone F; Insola A; Oliviero A
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):641-3. PubMed ID: 23085442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of motor cortex rTMS on corticospinal descending activity.
    Di Lazzaro V; Profice P; Pilato F; Dileone M; Oliviero A; Ziemann U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr; 121(4):464-73. PubMed ID: 20096628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.