These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24707787)

  • 1. Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R; Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1624-37. PubMed ID: 24707787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Adiv S; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):386-403. PubMed ID: 23421442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agency attributions of mental effort during self-regulated learning.
    Koriat A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):370-383. PubMed ID: 29110209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
    Scheck P; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Guttentag R
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11352205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age.
    Hoffmann-Biencourt A; Lockl K; Schneider W; Ackerman R; Koriat A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):767-84. PubMed ID: 21121466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.