252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24707790)
21. Influences of part-list cuing on different forms of episodic forgetting.
Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 21928931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural Differentiation Tracks Improved Recall of Competing Memories Following Interleaved Study and Retrieval Practice.
Hulbert JC; Norman KA
Cereb Cortex; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3994-4008. PubMed ID: 25477369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oscillatory Correlates of Selective Restudy.
Wirth M; Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():679823. PubMed ID: 34177499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists.
Bäuml KH; Kuhbandner C
Mem Cognit; 2003 Dec; 31(8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 15058680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selective retrieval in categorized lists: Detrimental, neutral, and beneficial effects on nonretrieved items.
Bäuml KT; Wallner L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1372-1386. PubMed ID: 31697144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gone but not forgotten: the transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.
MacLeod MD; Macrae CN
Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 11340924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Part-list cuing effects in younger and older adults' episodic recall.
Aslan A; John T
Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):262-267. PubMed ID: 29927271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
Abel M; Bäuml KT
Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 28770540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The development of automatic and controlled inhibitory retrieval processes in true and false recall.
Knott LM; Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Dewhurst SA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 May; 109(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 21320706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.
Sumowski JF; Coyne J; Cohen A; Deluca J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 95(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 24231401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
Lehman M; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Neurophysiological markers of retrieval-induced forgetting in multiplication fact retrieval.
Galfano G; Penolazzi B; Fardo F; Dhooge E; Angrilli A; Umiltà C
Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1681-91. PubMed ID: 21824154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Competitive retrieval is not a prerequisite for forgetting in the retrieval practice paradigm.
Camp G; Dalm S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 26569141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retrieval from episodic memory: neural mechanisms of interference resolution.
Wimber M; Rutschmann RM; Greenlee MW; Bäuml KH
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):538-49. PubMed ID: 18564040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.
Wilson SP; Kipp K; Chapman K
J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):359-79. PubMed ID: 14672100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Successful inhibition, unsuccessful retrieval: manipulating time and success during retrieval practice.
Storm BC; Nestojko JF
Memory; 2010 Feb; 18(2):99-114. PubMed ID: 19657962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
