BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24707845)

  • 1. When zero is greater than one: consumer misinterpretations of nutrition labels.
    Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1579-87. PubMed ID: 24707845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
    Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of front-of-pack labelling and regulated nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions of product healthfulness and purchase intentions: A randomized controlled trial.
    Franco-Arellano B; Vanderlee L; Ahmed M; Oh A; L'Abbé M
    Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104629. PubMed ID: 32061707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.
    Roseman MG; Joung HW; Littlejohn EI
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 May; 118(5):904-912. PubMed ID: 29198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial.
    Graham DJ; Lucas-Thompson RG; Mueller MP; Jaeb M; Harnack L
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):774-785. PubMed ID: 27745562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Traffic Light System Can Increase Healthfulness Perception: Implications for Policy Making.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2018; 50(7):668-674. PubMed ID: 29627330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice.
    Bialkova S; Sasse L; Fenko A
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():38-46. PubMed ID: 26341955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the Effects of Four Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchases of Five Common Beverages and Snack Foods: Results from a Randomized Trial.
    Acton RB; Kirkpatrick SI; Hammond D
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Jan; 122(1):38-48.e9. PubMed ID: 34493393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.
    Talati Z; Norman R; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Kelly B; Dixon H; Ball K; Miller C; Shilton T
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Dec; 14(1):171. PubMed ID: 29258543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choosing a front-of-package warning label for Brazil: A randomized, controlled comparison of three different label designs.
    Khandpur N; Mais LA; de Morais Sato P; Martins APB; Spinillo CG; Rojas CFU; Garcia MT; Jaime PC
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():854-861. PubMed ID: 31108818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Is Better? The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Type on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Behavior.
    Liao F; Li H
    Nutrients; 2023 May; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 37242208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of consumer understanding of different front-of-package nutrition labels, 2010-2011.
    Roberto CA; Bragg MA; Seamans MJ; Mechulan RL; Novak N; Brownell KD
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2012; 9():E149. PubMed ID: 22995103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing five front-of-pack nutrition labels' influence on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions.
    Gorski Findling MT; Werth PM; Musicus AA; Bragg MA; Graham DJ; Elbel B; Roberto CA
    Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 29066375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the Guideline Daily Amount and traffic-light systems.
    Arrúa A; Machín L; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Antúnez L; Alcaire F; Giménez A; Ares G
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Sep; 20(13):2308-2317. PubMed ID: 28625228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental Studies of Front-of-Package Nutrient Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Ultra-Processed Foods: A Scoping Review.
    Taillie LS; Hall MG; Popkin BM; Ng SW; Murukutla N
    Nutrients; 2020 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 32098363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nutrition warnings as front-of-pack labels: influence of design features on healthfulness perception and attentional capture.
    Cabrera M; Machín L; Arrúa A; Antúnez L; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Dec; 20(18):3360-3371. PubMed ID: 28965531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of front-of-package nutrition labeling on food purchases: a systematic review.
    An R; Shi Y; Shen J; Bullard T; Liu G; Yang Q; Chen N; Cao L
    Public Health; 2021 Feb; 191():59-67. PubMed ID: 33517247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.