These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24707912)

  • 41. Appearance-change instruction effects on eyewitness lineup identification accuracy are not moderated by amount of appearance change.
    Molinaro PF; Arndorfer A; Charman SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 23855325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is manipulative intent necessary to mitigate the eyewitness post-identification feedback effect?
    Quinlivan DS; Wells GL; Neuschatz JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):186-97. PubMed ID: 19399600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.
    Baldassari MJ; Moore KN; Hyman IE; Hope L; Mah EY; Lindsay DS; Mansour J; Saraiva R; Horry R; Rath H; Kelly L; Jones R; Vale S; Lawson B; Pedretti J; Palma TA; Cruz F; Quarenta J; Van der Cruyssen I; Mileva M; Allen J; Jeye B; Wiechert S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 36854842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.
    Smith AM; Ying RC; Goldstein AR; Fitzgerald RJ
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105877. PubMed ID: 39002429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.
    Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Providing witnesses with an option to say "I'm not sure" to a showup neither improves classification performance nor the reliability of suspect identifications.
    Jalava ST; Smith AM; Mackovichova S
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 33734750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How sure are you that this is the man you saw? Child witnesses can use confidence judgments to identify a target.
    Bruer KC; Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Sauer JD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):541-555. PubMed ID: 28816467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions?
    McCallum NA; Brewer N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13379. PubMed ID: 35927288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: what can they tell us about eyewitness memory?
    Horry R; Halford P; Brewer N; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):94-108. PubMed ID: 24127889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?
    Douglass AB; Neuschatz JS; Imrich J; Wilkinson M
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 19585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm.
    Davis JP; Maigut AC; Jolliffe D; Gibson SJ; Solomon CJ
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Dec; (106):e53298. PubMed ID: 26779673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.
    Elphick C; Philpot R; Zhang M; Stuart A; Pike G; Strathie A; Havard C; Walkington Z; Frumkin LA; Levine M; Price BA; Bandara AK; Nuseibeh B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():640513. PubMed ID: 33935892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sleep and eyewitness memory: Fewer false identifications after sleep when the target is absent from the lineup.
    Stepan ME; Dehnke TM; Fenn KM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182907. PubMed ID: 28877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Regularities in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.
    Bradfield AL; Wells GL; Olson EA
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 11916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.