217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24707976)
1. The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences.
Burra N; Kerzel D
Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):685-96. PubMed ID: 24707976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
Burra N; Kerzel D
Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The allocation of attention in displays with simultaneously presented singletons.
Akyürek EG; Schubö A
Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 21406208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potentials reveal the effect of prior knowledge on competition for representation and attentional capture.
Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
Psychophysiology; 2014 Jan; 51(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 24147640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses.
Mazza V; Turatto M; Umiltà C; Eimer M
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 17602216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
Kerzel D; Burra N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
