These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24708082)

  • 1. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.
    Stöber J; Dette DE; Musch J
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 12067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalizability analysis of score consistency for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding.
    Vispoel WP; Tao S
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Mar; 25(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 22867009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using G-Theory to Enhance Evidence of Reliability and Validity for Common Uses of the Paulhus Deception Scales.
    Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M
    Assessment; 2018 Jan; 25(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 27076506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding.
    Gignac GE
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 23862685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socially desirable responding in Chinese university students: denial and enhancement?
    Li F; Li Y; Wang Y
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Apr; 116(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 25730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
    Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): a factor analysis.
    Li F; Li Y
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 19320206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Faking Be Measured With Dedicated Validity Scales? Within-Subject Trifactor Mixture Modeling Applied to BIDR Responses.
    Guenole N; Brown A; Lim V
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 35786013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Note on the
    Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
    García-Pérez MA
    Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vividness of visual imagery and social desirable responding: correlations of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire with the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the Marlowe-Crowne scale.
    Allbutt J; Ling J; Rowley M; Shafiullah M
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 21494918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating an inventory for the assessment of egoistic bias and moralistic bias as two separable components of social desirability.
    Musch J; Ostapczuk M; Klaiber Y
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):620-9. PubMed ID: 22489614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management.
    Farrow TF; Burgess J; Wilkinson ID; Hunter MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():159-74. PubMed ID: 25527112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect.
    Kawilapat S; Maneeton B; Maneeton N; Prasitwattanaseree S; Kongsuk T; Arunpongpaisal S; Leejongpermpoon J; Sukhawaha S; Traisathit P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 36224520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using polytomous item response models to assess death anxiety.
    Gómez J; Hidalgo MD; Tomás-Sábado J
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17356439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.
    Davies MF; French CC; Keogh E
    J Psychol; 1998 Jul; 132(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 9637022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: the Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness Index.
    Peebles J; Moore RJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Aug; 54(5):621-8. PubMed ID: 9696112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
    Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.