These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24708353)
1. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 19304645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency and accuracy of visual search develop at different rates from early childhood through early adulthood. Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Quirós-Godoy M; Pérez-Hernández E; Wolfe JM Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Jun; 27(3):504-511. PubMed ID: 32043221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect. Rich AN; Kunar MA; Van Wert MJ; Hidalgo-Sotelo B; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):15.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic? Li A; Hulleman J; Wolfe JM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):15. PubMed ID: 38502280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search. Kunar MA; Rich AN; Wolfe JM Vis cogn; 2010 Jun; 18(6):881-897. PubMed ID: 21442052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Group efficiency based on the termination rule in the multiple-targets visual search task. Zhang H; Zhu PF; Yang CT Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39147959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging. Hong I; Wolfe JM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):30. PubMed ID: 38748189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science. Adamo SH; Gereke BJ; Shomstein S; Schmidt J Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Aug; 6(1):59. PubMed ID: 34455466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel, unbiased approach to evaluating subsequent search misses in dual target visual search. Becker MW; Anderson K; Brascamp JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3357-3373. PubMed ID: 32643106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Working Memory in Dual-Target Visual Search. Gorbunova ES; Kozlov KS; Le STT; Makarov IM Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1673. PubMed ID: 31417449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No Effect of the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex tDCS in Dual-Target Visual Search. Lanina AA; Feurra M; Gorbunova ES Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2112. PubMed ID: 30483172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE? Wolfe JM; Evans KK; Drew T; Aizenman A; Josephs E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):24-31. PubMed ID: 26656078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors. Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention. Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():258-265. PubMed ID: 27919677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search. Cain MS; Mitroff SR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1398-408. PubMed ID: 23163788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]