These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24708905)

  • 1. Interpreting lateral dynamic weight shifts using a simple inverted pendulum model.
    Kennedy MW; Bretl T; Schmiedeler JP
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 24708905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Error augmentation feedback for lateral weight shifting.
    O'Brien K; Crowell CR; Schmiedeler J
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():178-182. PubMed ID: 28324753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
    Kennedy MW; Crowell CR; Villano M; Schmiedeler JP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151393. PubMed ID: 26991996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficacy of various strategies for visual feedback in standing balance activities.
    Kennedy MW; Crowell CR; Striegel AD; Villano M; Schmiedeler JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 230(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 23836111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the type of visual feedback information change the control of standing balance?
    Dos Anjos F; Lemos T; Imbiriba LA
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Sep; 116(9):1771-9. PubMed ID: 27431210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing.
    Winter DA; Patla AE; Prince F; Ishac M; Gielo-Perczak K
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 Sep; 80(3):1211-21. PubMed ID: 9744933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Centre of pressure or centre of mass feedback in mediolateral balance assessment.
    Cofré Lizama LE; Pijnappels M; Reeves NP; Verschueren SM; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(3):539-43. PubMed ID: 25547025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Inverted Pendulum Model in standing for transtibial prosthesis users.
    Rusaw DF; Ramstrand S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Jan; 31():100-6. PubMed ID: 26472063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the limits of stability induced by weight-shifting training in elderly women.
    Gouglidis V; Nikodelis T; Hatzitaki V; Amiridis IG
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 Jan; 37(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 21240818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetrical stabilization and mobilization exploited during static single leg stance and goal directed kicking.
    King AC; Wang Z
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():182-190. PubMed ID: 28501732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensorimotor adaptation of whole-body postural control.
    Shiller DM; Veilleux LN; Marois M; Ballaz L; Lemay M
    Neuroscience; 2017 Jul; 356():217-228. PubMed ID: 28549560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NACOB presentation CSB New Investigator Award. Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. North American Congress on Biomechanics.
    Rietdyk S; Patla AE; Winter DA; Ishac MG; Little CE
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1149-58. PubMed ID: 10541064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of sagittal center of pressure offset on gait kinematics and kinetics.
    Haim A; Rozen N; Wolf A
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):969-77. PubMed ID: 20047747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moving beyond quiet stance: applicability of the inverted pendulum model to stooping and crouching postures.
    Weaver TB; Glinka MN; Laing AC
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3574-9. PubMed ID: 25262878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of stability metrics based on inverted pendulum models for assessment of ramp walking.
    Pickle NT; Wilken JM; Fey NP; Silverman AK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206875. PubMed ID: 30395597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controller Gains of an Inverted Pendulum are Influenced by the Visual Feedback Position.
    Cesonis J; Leib R; Franklin S; Franklin DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5068-5071. PubMed ID: 31946998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of quiet human stance: computer simulations of a triple inverted pendulum model.
    Günther M; Wagner H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):819-34. PubMed ID: 26214594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensori-motor integration during stance: time adaptation of control mechanisms on adding or removing vision.
    Sozzi S; Monti A; De Nunzio AM; Do MC; Schieppati M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Apr; 30(2):172-89. PubMed ID: 20727610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors.
    Loram ID; Gawthrop PJ; Lakie M
    J Physiol; 2006 Nov; 577(Pt 1):417-32. PubMed ID: 16973712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of joint immobilization on standing balance.
    de Freitas PB; Freitas SM; Duarte M; Latash ML; Zatsiorsky VM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Aug; 28(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 19342114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.