138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24709131)
1. [Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].
Yang Q; Chen B; Peng G; Li Z; Huang Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 50(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 24709131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of segmented measurement of axial length in ultra-high myopia filled with silicone oil using immersion B-scan ultrasonography.
Yang QH; Zhang HT; Li XQ; Chen B; Li ZH; Huang YF; Jin X; Zhang Y; Wang LQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(5):793-799. PubMed ID: 35601170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.
Landers J; Goggin M
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 37(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 19702705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes.
Yang QH; Chen B; Peng GH; Li ZH; Huang YF
Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 24967188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster.
Olsen T; Thorwest M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1345-50. PubMed ID: 16105605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
Rose LT; Moshegov CN
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Partial coherent interferometry--an alternative method for intraocular lens power calculation performed by ultrasonography].
Wylegała E; Ludyga A
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 15515318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.
Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
Ophthalmology; 2011 Mar; 118(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 21035871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Selection of IOL power formula for patients with cataract and high myopia].
Tang P; Pan YC
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 May; 39(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 12892606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A study on axis length measurement of high myopia with cataract].
Chen C; Chen W; Lin Y; He Y; Lu M
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2005 Dec; 21(4):124-6, 130. PubMed ID: 17162866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of IOL master and A-scan immersion biometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.
Kunavisarut P; Poopattanakul P; Intarated C; Pathanapitoon K
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 22878446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of IOL calculations in children: a comparison of immersion versus contact A-scan biometery.
Ben-Zion I; Neely DE; Plager DA; Ofner S; Sprunger DT; Roberts GJ
J AAPOS; 2008 Oct; 12(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 18599330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster.
Freeman G; Pesudovs K
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 16029267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis.
Packer M; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Coffman PG; Brown LK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 11821203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intraocular lens calculation and ultrasound biometry: immersion and contact procedures].
Hoffmann PC; Hütz WW; Eckhardt HB; Heuring AH
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Sep; 213(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 9793914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.
Abu El Einen KG; Shalaby MH; El Shiwy HT
Retina; 2011 Feb; 31(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 20829737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
